rs776038451
Variant summary
Our verdict is Pathogenic. Variant got 10 ACMG points: 10P and 0B. PM2PP5_Very_Strong
The NM_004569.5(PIGH):c.307T>C(p.Ser103Pro) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000341 in 1,613,474 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Pathogenic (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_004569.5 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Pathogenic. Variant got 10 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00000657 AC: 1AN: 152188Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0000159 AC: 4AN: 251402Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.0000147 AC XY: 2AN XY: 135898
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000370 AC: 54AN: 1461286Hom.: 0 Cov.: 30 AF XY: 0.0000344 AC XY: 25AN XY: 727002
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00000657 AC: 1AN: 152188Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 74342
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Glycosylphosphatidylinositol biosynthesis defect 17 Pathogenic:3
- -
- -
The missense variant p.S103P in PIGH (NM_004569.5) has been previously reported in homozygous state in an affected individual with developmental delay and autism (Nguyen TTM et al). Analysis of surface expression on granulocytes had revealed a reduced expression. The proband did not have epileptic encephalopathy but had two episodes of febrile seizures. The variant has been submitted to the ClinVar database as Pathogenic using the above as reference. The p.S103P variant is observed in 4/1,13,714 (0.0035%) alleles from individuals of European (Non-Finnish) background in gnomAD Exomes and is novel (not in any individuals) in 1000 Genomes. There is a moderate physicochemical difference between serine and proline. The p.S103P missense variant is predicted to be damaging by both SIFT and PolyPhen2. The nucleotide c.307 in PIGH is predicted conserved by GERP++ and PhyloP across 100 vertebrates. For these reasons, this variant has been classified as Pathogenic. -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at