rs77612903

Variant names:

Your query was ambiguous. Multiple possible variants found:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -14 ACMG points: 0P and 14B. BP4_StrongBP6BP7BS1BS2

The NM_004387.4(NKX2-5):c.861C>T(p.Ala287Ala) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0013 in 1,611,166 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 18 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. A287A) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0064 ( 8 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00076 ( 10 hom. )

Consequence

NKX2-5
NM_004387.4 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:8

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.520

Variant links:

Genes affected

NKX2-5 (HGNC:2488): (NK2 homeobox 5) This gene encodes a homeobox-containing transcription factor. This transcription factor functions in heart formation and development. Mutations in this gene cause atrial septal defect with atrioventricular conduction defect, and also tetralogy of Fallot, which are both heart malformation diseases. Mutations in this gene can also cause congenital hypothyroidism non-goitrous type 5, a non-autoimmune condition. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, Oct 2009]

NKX2-5 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -14 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.67).

BP6

Variant 5-173232683-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr5-173232683-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 138525.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Uncertain_significance=1, Benign=6}. Variant chr5-173232683-G-A is described in Lovd as [Benign].

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.52 with no splicing effect.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.0064 (975/152392) while in subpopulation AFR AF = 0.0218 (908/41602). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0206. There are 8 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 443 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position FAILED quality control check.

BS2

High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 8 SD gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
NKX2-5	NM_004387.4 link	c.861C>T	p.Ala287Ala	synonymous_variant	Exon 2 of 2	ENST00000329198.5	NP_004378.1	P52952-1A0A0S2Z383
NKX2-5	NM_001166176.2 link	c.*660C>T		3_prime_UTR_variant	Exon 2 of 2		NP_001159648.1	P52952-2
NKX2-5	NM_001166175.2 link	c.*814C>T		3_prime_UTR_variant	Exon 2 of 2		NP_001159647.1	P52952-3A0A0S2Z3K2

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	UniProt
NKX2-5	ENST00000329198.5 link	c.861C>T	p.Ala287Ala	synonymous_variant	Exon 2 of 2	1	NM_004387.4	ENSP00000327758.4	P52952-1
NKX2-5	ENST00000424406.2 link	c.*814C>T		downstream_gene_variant		1		ENSP00000395378.2	P52952-3
NKX2-5	ENST00000521848.1 link	c.*660C>T		downstream_gene_variant		2		ENSP00000427906.1	P52952-2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.00638

AC:

971

AN:

152274

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0218

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00242

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.000235

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00669

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.00175

AC:

433

AN:

247808

AF XY:

0.00133

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.0242

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.000667

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.000260

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000497

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000763

AC:

1113

AN:

1458774

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000706

AC XY:

512

AN XY:

725200

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.0227

AC:

758

AN:

33424

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.000918

AC:

AN:

44658

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

26096

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

39636

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.0000232

AC:

AN:

86206

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

52516

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.000201

AC:

223

AN:

1110244

Gnomad4 Remaining exome

AF:

0.00131

AC:

AN:

60236

Heterozygous variant carriers

151

226

302

377

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Exome Het

Exome Hom

Variant carriers

120

150

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.00640

AC:

975

AN:

152392

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00594

AC XY:

443

AN XY:

74526

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.0218

AC:

0.0218259

AN:

0.0218259

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.00242

AC:

0.00241609

AN:

0.00241609

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.000235

AC:

0.000235163

AN:

0.000235163

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00662

AC:

0.00661626

AN:

0.00661626

Heterozygous variant carriers

107

160

214

267

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Genome Het

Genome Hom

Variant carriers

100

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.00513

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.00704

Asia WGS

AF:

0.00173

AC:

AN:

3478

EpiCase

AF:

0.000273

EpiControl

AF:

0.000296

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:8

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified

Uncertain:1Benign:5

Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center

Significance:Benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center

Significance:Benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

May 07, 2014

GeneDx

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Apr 09, 2025

Molecular Diagnostic Laboratory for Inherited Cardiovascular Disease, Montreal Heart Institute

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Feb 08, 2013

Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Feb 23, 2017

Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Atrial septal defect 7

Benign:1

Jan 30, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not provided

Benign:1

Jun 11, 2024

ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Cardiovascular phenotype

Benign:1

Mar 15, 2016

Ambry Genetics

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.67

CADD

Benign

7.1

DANN

Benign

0.93

Mutation Taster

=96/4

polymorphism

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over