rs776621429

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -1 ACMG points: 2P and 3B. PM2BP4_ModerateBP6

The NM_000057.4(BLM):c.3210+4A>G variant causes a splice donor region, intron change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000108 in 1,567,462 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.000013 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.000011 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

BLM
NM_000057.4 splice_donor_region, intron

Scores

Splicing: ADA: 0.9347

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:7B:2

Conservation

PhyloP100: 3.60

Variant links:

Genes affected

BLM (HGNC:1058): (BLM RecQ like helicase) The Bloom syndrome is an autosomal recessive disorder characterized by growth deficiency, microcephaly and immunodeficiency among others. It is caused by homozygous or compound heterozygous mutation in the gene encoding DNA helicase RecQ protein on chromosome 15q26. This Bloom-associated helicase unwinds a variety of DNA substrates including Holliday junction, and is involved in several pathways contributing to the maintenance of genome stability. Identification of pathogenic Bloom variants is required for heterozygote testing in at-risk families. [provided by RefSeq, May 2020]

BLM links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -1 ACMG points.

PM2

Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage;

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.44).

BP6

Variant 15-90794361-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr15-90794361-A-G is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 236811.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Uncertain_significance=6, Likely_benign=2}.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	MANE	UniProt
BLM	NM_000057.4 linkuse as main transcript	c.3210+4A>G		splice_donor_region_variant, intron_variant		ENST00000355112.8

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	TSL	MANE	Appris	UniProt
BLM	ENST00000355112.8 linkuse as main transcript	c.3210+4A>G		splice_donor_region_variant, intron_variant		1	NM_000057.4	P2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.0000132

AC:

AN:

151728

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.000131

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.00

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.0000622

AC:

AN:

209104

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.0000263

AC XY:

AN XY:

114008

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.000496

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.0000106

AC:

AN:

1415734

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00000569

AC XY:

AN XY:

703146

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.000403

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.00

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.0000132

AC:

AN:

151728

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000135

AC XY:

AN XY:

74116

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.000131

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00

Bravo

AF:

0.0000416

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:7Benign:2

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Bloom syndrome

Uncertain:4Benign:1

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Invitae	Jan 19, 2024	- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics	Jan 11, 2022	- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Baylor Genetics	Nov 09, 2020	This variant was determined to be of uncertain significance according to ACMG Guidelines, 2015 [PMID:25741868]. -
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided	clinical testing	Natera, Inc.	May 01, 2018	- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Counsyl	Feb 09, 2017	- -

not provided

Uncertain:2

Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano	Dec 03, 2022	To the best of our knowledge, the variant has not been reported in the published literature. The frequency of this variant in the general population, 0.00052 (14/27058 chromosomes, http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org), is uninformative in assessment of its pathogenicity. Analysis of this variant using software algorithms for the prediction of the effect of nucleotide changes on splicing yielded predictions that this variant does not affect BLM mRNA splicing . Based on the available information, we are unable to determine the clinical significance of this variant. -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	GeneDx	Feb 06, 2023	Has not been previously published as pathogenic or benign to our knowledge; In silico analysis is inconclusive as to whether the variant alters gene splicing. In the absence of RNA/functional studies, the actual effect of this sequence change is unknown. -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome

Uncertain:1

Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Ambry Genetics

Jul 03, 2023

The c.3210+4A>G intronic variant results from an A to G substitution 4 nucleotides after coding exon 15 in the BLM gene. This nucleotide position is well conserved in available vertebrate species. In silico splice site analysis predicts that this alteration may weaken the native splice donor site. Since supporting evidence is limited at this time, the clinical significance of this alteration remains unclear. -

BLM-related disorder

Benign:1

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Dec 04, 2020

This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.44

Cadd

Benign

Dann

Benign

0.81

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

dbscSNV1_ADA

Benign

0.93

dbscSNV1_RF

Benign

0.66

SpliceAI score (max)

0.36

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

DS_DL_spliceai

0.36

Position offset: -4

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over