rs776759641

Positions:

chr19-6361674-C-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -7 ACMG points: 2P and 9B. PM2BP4_StrongBP6BS1

The ENST00000245816.11(CLPP):c.100C>T(p.Pro34Ser) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000112 in 1,442,702 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. P34L) has been classified as Uncertain significance.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00011 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00011 ( 1 hom. )

Consequence

CLPP
ENST00000245816.11 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:2

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.0400

Variant links:

Genes affected

CLPP (HGNC:2084): (caseinolytic mitochondrial matrix peptidase proteolytic subunit) The protein encoded by this gene belongs to the peptidase family S14 and hydrolyzes proteins into small peptides in the presence of ATP and magnesium. The protein is transported into mitochondrial matrix and is associated with the inner mitochondrial membrane. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

CLPP links:

(HGNC:):

links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -7 ACMG points.

PM2

Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage;

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.03057614).

BP6

Variant 19-6361674-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr19-6361674-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 505534.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Uncertain_significance=1, Likely_benign=2}.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population mid. gnomad4_exome allele frequency = 0.000113 (146/1290374) while in subpopulation MID AF= 0.00735 (38/5172). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0055. There are 1 homozygotes in gnomad4_exome. There are 66 alleles in male gnomad4_exome subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	MANE	Protein	UniProt
CLPP	NM_006012.4 linkuse as main transcript	c.100C>T	p.Pro34Ser	missense_variant	1/6	ENST00000245816.11	NP_006003.1
CLPP	XM_047439486.1 linkuse as main transcript	c.100C>T	p.Pro34Ser	missense_variant	1/5		XP_047295442.1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris
CLPP	ENST00000245816.11 linkuse as main transcript	c.100C>T	p.Pro34Ser	missense_variant	1/6	1	NM_006012.4	ENSP00000245816	P1
	ENST00000595644.1 linkuse as main transcript	n.35+441G>A		intron_variant, non_coding_transcript_variant		4
CLPP	ENST00000594780.1 linkuse as main transcript	n.1C>T		non_coding_transcript_exon_variant	1/4	2
CLPP	ENST00000596070.1 linkuse as main transcript	n.110C>T		non_coding_transcript_exon_variant	1/5	5

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.000105

AC:

AN:

152210

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0000241

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.000262

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.000193

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.000207

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.000132

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.000176

AC:

AN:

62462

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.000207

AC XY:

AN XY:

33868

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.000340

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.000199

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00102

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000113

AC:

146

AN:

1290374

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000105

AC XY:

AN XY:

628338

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.000540

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.000153

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.0000916

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.0000708

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.000261

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.000105

AC:

AN:

152328

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000806

AC XY:

AN XY:

74486

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.0000240

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.000261

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.000193

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.000207

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.000132

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00

Alfa

AF:

0.000218

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.000181

ExAC

AF:

0.0000394

AC:

Asia WGS

AF:

0.000289

AC:

AN:

3478

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:2

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided

Benign:2

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp	Jun 20, 2023	- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	GeneDx	Dec 04, 2020	This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 29240891) -

not specified

Uncertain:1

Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine

Jan 12, 2017

Variant classified as Uncertain Significance - Favor Benign. The p.Pro34Ser vari ant in CLPP has been previously reported by our laboratory in one Kuwaiti family with hearing loss; however, a second variant affecting the remaining allele was not identified. This variant has been identified in 1/1346 European chromosomes by the Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC, http://exac.broadinstitute.org; dbSN P rs776759641). Proline (Pro) at position 34 is not conserved in mammals or evol utionarily distant species and 2 mammals (Guinea pigs and Tasmanian devils) carr y a serine (Ser), raising the possibility that this change may be tolerated. Add itional computational prediction tools do not provide strong support for or agai nst an impact to the protein. In summary, while the clinical significance of the p.Pro34Ser variant is uncertain, the lack of conservation suggests that it is m ore likely to be benign. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Benign

0.067

BayesDel_addAF

Benign

-0.48

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.61

CADD

Benign

9.3

DANN

Benign

0.86

DEOGEN2

Benign

0.15

Eigen

Benign

-1.6

Eigen_PC

Benign

-1.7

FATHMM_MKL

Benign

0.019

LIST_S2

Benign

0.41

M_CAP

Benign

0.030

MetaRNN

Benign

0.031

MetaSVM

Benign

-1.1

MutationAssessor

Benign

0.20

MutationTaster

Benign

1.0

PrimateAI

Uncertain

0.57

PROVEAN

Benign

0.58

REVEL

Benign

0.020

Sift

Benign

0.038

Sift4G

Benign

0.17

Polyphen

0.0010

Vest4

0.21

MutPred

0.25

Loss of catalytic residue at P33 (P = 0.0144);

MVP

0.15

MPC

0.76

ClinPred

0.027

GERP RS

-1.9

RBP_binding_hub_radar

0.0

RBP_regulation_power_radar

2.1

Varity_R

0.027

gMVP

0.27

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over