rs77702567

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2

The NM_001005361.3(DNM2):ā€‹c.519T>Cā€‹(p.Ala173=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000582 in 1,614,072 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 4 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (ā˜…ā˜…).

Frequency

Genomes: š‘“ 0.0032 ( 1 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes š‘“: 0.00031 ( 3 hom. )

Consequence

DNM2
NM_001005361.3 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:10

Conservation

PhyloP100: -3.72
Variant links:
Genes affected
DNM2 (HGNC:2974): (dynamin 2) Dynamins represent one of the subfamilies of GTP-binding proteins. These proteins share considerable sequence similarity over the N-terminal portion of the molecule, which contains the GTPase domain. Dynamins are associated with microtubules. They have been implicated in cell processes such as endocytosis and cell motility, and in alterations of the membrane that accompany certain activities such as bone resorption by osteoclasts. Dynamins bind many proteins that bind actin and other cytoskeletal proteins. Dynamins can also self-assemble, a process that stimulates GTPase activity. Five alternatively spliced transcripts encoding different proteins have been described. Additional alternatively spliced transcripts may exist, but their full-length nature has not been determined. [provided by RefSeq, Jun 2010]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.81).
BP6
Variant 19-10775836-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr19-10775836-T-C is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 256869.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr19-10775836-T-C is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-3.72 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.0032 (487/152300) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.0114 (472/41562). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0105. There are 1 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 250 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 3 AD,AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
DNM2NM_001005361.3 linkuse as main transcriptc.519T>C p.Ala173= synonymous_variant 4/21 ENST00000389253.9

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
DNM2ENST00000389253.9 linkuse as main transcriptc.519T>C p.Ala173= synonymous_variant 4/215 NM_001005361.3 A1P50570-4

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00317
AC:
483
AN:
152182
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0113
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000851
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.000956
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.000767
AC:
192
AN:
250466
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.000443
AC XY:
60
AN XY:
135406
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0104
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000521
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.0000327
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0000265
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000327
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000309
AC:
452
AN:
1461772
Hom.:
3
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.000253
AC XY:
184
AN XY:
727204
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.0112
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.000514
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0000812
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00000450
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.000629
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00320
AC:
487
AN:
152300
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00336
AC XY:
250
AN XY:
74476
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.0114
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.000850
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.000946
Alfa
AF:
0.00112
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.00372

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:10
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCeGaT Center for Human Genetics TuebingenJul 01, 2022DNM2: BP4, BP7, BS1, BS2 -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP LaboratoriesJan 09, 2020- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitternot providedBreakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics-- -
not specified Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAthena DiagnosticsOct 31, 2016- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxApr 16, 2015This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease dominant intermediate B Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 12, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpJan 22, 2024- -
Autosomal dominant centronuclear myopathy Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 12, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Inborn genetic diseases Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsJul 11, 2019This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
DNM2-related disorder Benign:1
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact SciencesAug 25, 2020This variant is classified as benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.81
CADD
Benign
0.25
DANN
Benign
0.41
RBP_binding_hub_radar
1.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
2.8

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs77702567; hg19: chr19-10886512; API