rs77710085
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points: 0P and 9B. BP4_StrongBP6BS2
The NM_000742.4(CHRNA2):c.745G>A(p.Ala249Thr) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000142 in 1,579,402 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 6 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000742.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHRNA2 | NM_000742.4 | c.745G>A | p.Ala249Thr | missense_variant | 6/7 | ENST00000407991.3 | NP_000733.2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHRNA2 | ENST00000407991.3 | c.745G>A | p.Ala249Thr | missense_variant | 6/7 | 5 | NM_000742.4 | ENSP00000385026 | P2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000322 AC: 39AN: 120932Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000224 AC: 56AN: 250152Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000200 AC XY: 27AN XY: 135270
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000127 AC: 185AN: 1458332Hom.: 6 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.000125 AC XY: 91AN XY: 725312
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000322 AC: 39AN: 121070Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.000202 AC XY: 12AN XY: 59532
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Uncertain:1Benign:2
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Nov 22, 2016 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Dec 18, 2020 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Athena Diagnostics | Mar 05, 2018 | - - |
Autosomal dominant nocturnal frontal lobe epilepsy Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 21, 2024 | - - |
Inborn genetic diseases Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Jan 08, 2019 | This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Autosomal dominant nocturnal frontal lobe epilepsy 4 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
CHRNA2-related disorder Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | Mar 18, 2020 | This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at