rs777800614
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -4 ACMG points: 0P and 4B. BP4_Strong
The NM_016622.4(MRPL35):c.7G>A(p.Ala3Thr) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000242 in 1,614,070 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 16/22 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. A3S) has been classified as Likely benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_016622.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -4 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_016622.4. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
RefSeq Transcripts
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MRPL35 | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.7G>A | p.Ala3Thr | missense | Exon 1 of 4 | ENSP00000338389.4 | Q9NZE8-1 | ||
| MRPL35 | TSL:1 | c.7G>A | p.Ala3Thr | missense | Exon 1 of 5 | ENSP00000254644.7 | Q9NZE8-2 | ||
| MRPL35 | TSL:3 | c.7G>A | p.Ala3Thr | missense | Exon 1 of 5 | ENSP00000386255.1 | D3YTC1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00000657 AC: 1AN: 152266Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.0000398 AC: 10AN: 251358 AF XY: 0.0000515 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000260 AC: 38AN: 1461804Hom.: 1 Cov.: 30 AF XY: 0.0000261 AC XY: 19AN XY: 727200 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00000657 AC: 1AN: 152266Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 74384 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at