rs778423110
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -13 ACMG points: 0P and 13B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7
The NM_080680.3(COL11A2):c.4026C>T(p.Gly1342Gly) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000242 in 1,612,672 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_080680.3 synonymous
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- autosomal dominant nonsyndromic hearing loss 13Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, MODERATE, LIMITED Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, PanelApp Australia, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P
- nonsyndromic genetic hearing lossInheritance: AD, AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, MODERATE Submitted by: ClinGen
- otospondylomegaepiphyseal dysplasia, autosomal dominantInheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, MODERATE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: PanelApp Australia, Ambry Genetics, Orphanet, Genomics England PanelApp, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P
- autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 53Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, MODERATE Submitted by: G2P, PanelApp Australia, Ambry Genetics, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
- otospondylomegaepiphyseal dysplasiaInheritance: AR, AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet, ClinGen
- otospondylomegaepiphyseal dysplasia, autosomal recessiveInheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, MODERATE Submitted by: PanelApp Australia, Ambry Genetics, G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
- autosomal dominant nonsyndromic hearing lossInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
- fibrochondrogenesisInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
- hearing loss, autosomal recessiveInheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -13 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| COL11A2 | NM_080680.3 | c.4026C>T | p.Gly1342Gly | synonymous_variant | Exon 56 of 66 | ENST00000341947.7 | NP_542411.2 |
Ensembl
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| COL11A2 | ENST00000341947.7 | c.4026C>T | p.Gly1342Gly | synonymous_variant | Exon 56 of 66 | 5 | NM_080680.3 | ENSP00000339915.2 | ||
| COL11A2 | ENST00000374708.8 | c.3768C>T | p.Gly1256Gly | synonymous_variant | Exon 54 of 64 | 5 | ENSP00000363840.4 | |||
| COL11A2 | ENST00000477772.1 | n.273-1706C>T | intron_variant | Intron 5 of 8 | 2 | |||||
| COL11A2 | ENST00000683572.1 | n.-8C>T | upstream_gene_variant |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000329 AC: 5AN: 152184Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.0000414 AC: 10AN: 241332 AF XY: 0.0000227 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000233 AC: 34AN: 1460488Hom.: 0 Cov.: 40 AF XY: 0.0000124 AC XY: 9AN XY: 726548 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000329 AC: 5AN: 152184Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000538 AC XY: 4AN XY: 74344 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:2
- -
- -
not specified Benign:1
p.Gly1342Gly in exon 56 of COL11A2: This variant is not expected to have clinica l significance because it does not alter an amino acid residue, and it is not lo cated within the splice consensus sequence. It has been identified in (8/18696) of East Asian chromosomes by the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD, http://gn omad.broadinstitute.org; dbSNP rs778423110). -
COL11A2-related disorder Benign:1
This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at