rs778803626
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -17 ACMG points: 0P and 17B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1
The NM_000062.3(SERPING1):c.279G>A(p.Glu93Glu) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000072 in 1,611,142 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000062.3 synonymous
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -17 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000860 AC: 13AN: 151244Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0000841 AC: 21AN: 249638Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.0000741 AC XY: 10AN XY: 134930
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000706 AC: 103AN: 1459782Hom.: 1 Cov.: 34 AF XY: 0.0000620 AC XY: 45AN XY: 726272
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000859 AC: 13AN: 151360Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000676 AC XY: 5AN XY: 73936
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:2
- -
- -
not specified Benign:1
Variant identified in a genome or exome case(s) and assessed due to predicted null impact of the variant or pathogenic assertions in the literature or databases. Disclaimer: This variant has not undergone full assessment. The following are preliminary notes: Silent variant not in splice consensus, gene associated with hereditary angioedma -
Inborn genetic diseases Benign:1
This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at