Menu
GeneBe

rs778843530

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -4 ACMG points: 0P and 4B. BS2

The NM_002691.4(POLD1):c.1174G>A(p.Val392Met) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000233 in 1,461,812 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. V392L) has been classified as Uncertain significance.

Frequency

Genomes: not found (cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.000023 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

POLD1
NM_002691.4 missense

Scores

8
10

Clinical Significance

Uncertain significance criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts U:6

Conservation

PhyloP100: 4.07
Variant links:
Genes affected
POLD1 (HGNC:9175): (DNA polymerase delta 1, catalytic subunit) This gene encodes the 125-kDa catalytic subunit of DNA polymerase delta. DNA polymerase delta possesses both polymerase and 3' to 5' exonuclease activity and plays a critical role in DNA replication and repair. Alternatively spliced transcript variants have been observed for this gene, and a pseudogene of this gene is located on the long arm of chromosome 6. [provided by RefSeq, Mar 2012]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -4 ACMG points.

BS2
High AC in GnomAdExome at 6 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
POLD1NM_002691.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.1174G>A p.Val392Met missense_variant 10/27 ENST00000440232.7

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
POLD1ENST00000440232.7 linkuse as main transcriptc.1174G>A p.Val392Met missense_variant 10/271 NM_002691.4 P1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
Cov.:
32
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.0000239
AC:
6
AN:
251472
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.0000294
AC XY:
4
AN XY:
135908
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0000289
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.0000327
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0000352
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0000233
AC:
34
AN:
1461812
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.0000206
AC XY:
15
AN XY:
727224
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.0000299
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.0000224
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.0000252
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0000116
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.0000261
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.0000166
GnomAD4 genome
Cov.:
32
Alfa
AF:
0.0000564
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.0000302
ExAC
AF:
0.00000824
AC:
1

ClinVar

Significance: Uncertain significance
Submissions summary: Uncertain:6
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Uncertain:2
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxOct 13, 2022Not observed at a significant frequency in large population cohorts (gnomAD); In silico analysis supports that this missense variant does not alter protein structure/function; Observed in a cohort of individuals with hypertriglyceridemia and familial hypercholesterolemia (Dron et al., 2020); This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 23528559, 29717118, 32041611, 20951805) -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingQuest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan CapistranoJan 25, 2023The frequency of this variant in the general population, 0.000035 (4/113762 chromosomes, http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org), is uninformative in assessment of its pathogenicity. In the published literature, the variant has been reported in individuals with endometrial cancer as a somatic mutation (PMID: 23528559 (2013), 29717118 (2018)). It has also been reported in a cohort of individuals with dyslipidemia and metabolic disorders (PMID: 32041611 (2020)). Analysis of this variant using bioinformatics tools for the prediction of the effect of amino acid changes on protein structure and function yielded conflicting predictions that this variant is benign or damaging. Based on the available information, we are unable to determine the clinical significance of this variant. -
Colorectal cancer, susceptibility to, 10 Uncertain:2
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeDec 14, 2023This sequence change replaces valine, which is neutral and non-polar, with methionine, which is neutral and non-polar, at codon 392 of the POLD1 protein (p.Val392Met). This variant is present in population databases (rs778843530, gnomAD 0.004%). This variant has not been reported in the literature in individuals affected with POLD1-related conditions. ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 408053). Advanced modeling of protein sequence and biophysical properties (such as structural, functional, and spatial information, amino acid conservation, physicochemical variation, residue mobility, and thermodynamic stability) performed at Invitae indicates that this missense variant is not expected to disrupt POLD1 protein function with a negative predictive value of 80%. In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingBaylor GeneticsMay 16, 2023- -
not specified Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenetic Services Laboratory, University of ChicagoSep 23, 2021- -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsJun 16, 2022The p.V392M variant (also known as c.1174G>A), located in coding exon 9 of the POLD1 gene, results from a G to A substitution at nucleotide position 1174. The valine at codon 392 is replaced by methionine, an amino acid with highly similar properties. This alteration was observed as a somatic alteration in an endometrial tumor that displayed mismatch repair deficiency and did not display mutational signatures associated with loss of polymerase proofreading (Haradhvala NJ et al. Nat Commun, 2018 05;9:1746). This amino acid position is not well conserved in available vertebrate species. In addition, this alteration is predicted to be tolerated by in silico analysis. Since supporting evidence is limited at this time, the clinical significance of this alteration remains unclear. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Uncertain
0.38
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.18
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.38
Cadd
Uncertain
24
Dann
Uncertain
1.0
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.31
T;.;.;T
Eigen
Uncertain
0.27
Eigen_PC
Benign
0.18
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
0.79
D
M_CAP
Benign
0.014
T
MetaRNN
Uncertain
0.53
D;D;D;D
MetaSVM
Benign
-1.1
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
2.0
M;.;.;M
MutationTaster
Benign
0.88
D
PrimateAI
Uncertain
0.64
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-1.9
N;.;.;.
REVEL
Benign
0.26
Sift
Uncertain
0.016
D;.;.;.
Sift4G
Uncertain
0.014
D;D;D;D
Polyphen
0.95
P;.;.;P
Vest4
0.38
MutPred
0.78
Loss of catalytic residue at V392 (P = 0.0836);Loss of catalytic residue at V392 (P = 0.0836);Loss of catalytic residue at V392 (P = 0.0836);Loss of catalytic residue at V392 (P = 0.0836);
MVP
0.48
MPC
0.91
ClinPred
0.56
D
GERP RS
2.8
Varity_R
0.27
gMVP
0.77

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs778843530; hg19: chr19-50906786; COSMIC: COSV70954898; COSMIC: COSV70954898; API