rs77895476

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1

The NM_001145809.2(MYH14):​c.1890C>T​(p.Val630Val) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0166 in 1,601,110 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 487 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.032 ( 136 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.015 ( 351 hom. )

Consequence

MYH14
NM_001145809.2 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:6

Conservation

PhyloP100: -4.40

Publications

7 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
MYH14 (HGNC:23212): (myosin heavy chain 14) This gene encodes a member of the myosin superfamily. The protein represents a conventional non-muscle myosin; it should not be confused with the unconventional myosin-14 (MYO14). Myosins are actin-dependent motor proteins with diverse functions including regulation of cytokinesis, cell motility, and cell polarity. Mutations in this gene result in one form of autosomal dominant hearing impairment. Multiple transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Dec 2011]
MYH14 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • autosomal dominant nonsyndromic hearing loss 4A
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: PanelApp Australia, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Ambry Genetics
  • peripheral neuropathy-myopathy-hoarseness-hearing loss syndrome
    Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG, MODERATE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet, Ambry Genetics, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
  • nonsyndromic genetic hearing loss
    Inheritance: AD Classification: MODERATE Submitted by: ClinGen
  • autosomal dominant nonsyndromic hearing loss
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.67).
BP6
Variant 19-50252698-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr19-50252698-C-T is described in ClinVar as Benign. ClinVar VariationId is 44051.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-4.4 with no splicing effect.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (EAS) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.089 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
MYH14NM_001145809.2 linkc.1890C>T p.Val630Val synonymous_variant Exon 16 of 43 ENST00000642316.2 NP_001139281.1
MYH14NM_001077186.2 linkc.1890C>T p.Val630Val synonymous_variant Exon 16 of 42 NP_001070654.1
MYH14NM_024729.4 linkc.1866C>T p.Val622Val synonymous_variant Exon 15 of 41 NP_079005.3

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
MYH14ENST00000642316.2 linkc.1890C>T p.Val630Val synonymous_variant Exon 16 of 43 NM_001145809.2 ENSP00000493594.1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0322
AC:
4905
AN:
152152
Hom.:
136
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0715
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00658
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0227
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.0245
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.0963
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.0112
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.0186
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.0159
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0101
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.0301
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.0229
AC:
5232
AN:
228332
AF XY:
0.0213
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0750
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0126
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.0209
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.0982
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.0173
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0120
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.0208
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0150
AC:
21676
AN:
1448840
Hom.:
351
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.0145
AC XY:
10428
AN XY:
719462
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0758
AC:
2514
AN:
33148
American (AMR)
AF:
0.0132
AC:
566
AN:
42876
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.0203
AC:
526
AN:
25860
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.0810
AC:
3159
AN:
39024
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.0101
AC:
847
AN:
83808
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.0160
AC:
835
AN:
52324
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.0234
AC:
135
AN:
5762
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0106
AC:
11766
AN:
1106124
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.0222
AC:
1328
AN:
59914
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.480
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
1063
2126
3189
4252
5315
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
544
1088
1632
2176
2720
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0322
AC:
4907
AN:
152270
Hom.:
136
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0323
AC XY:
2406
AN XY:
74456
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0714
AC:
2965
AN:
41548
American (AMR)
AF:
0.0226
AC:
346
AN:
15292
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.0245
AC:
85
AN:
3472
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.0959
AC:
497
AN:
5180
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.0116
AC:
56
AN:
4820
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.0186
AC:
197
AN:
10612
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.0137
AC:
4
AN:
292
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0101
AC:
686
AN:
68028
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.0307
AC:
65
AN:
2114
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.501
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
228
457
685
914
1142
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
56
112
168
224
280
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.0279
Hom.:
79
Bravo
AF:
0.0357
Asia WGS
AF:
0.0490
AC:
172
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:6
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Benign:3
Jan 27, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

- -

May 23, 2018
Athena Diagnostics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not specified Benign:2
Oct 05, 2017
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

May 07, 2012
Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Val630Val in Exon 16 of MYH14: This variant is not expected to have clinical si gnificance because it does not alter an amino acid residue, is not located withi n the splice consensus sequence, and has been identified in 6.6% (243/3694) of A frican American chromosomes from a broad population by the NHLBI Exome Sequencin g Project (http://evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS; dbSNP rs77895476). -

Autosomal dominant nonsyndromic hearing loss 4A Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.67
CADD
Benign
0.19
DANN
Benign
0.93
PhyloP100
-4.4
Mutation Taster
=99/1
polymorphism (auto)

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs77895476; hg19: chr19-50755955; COSMIC: COSV51813004; COSMIC: COSV51813004; API