rs780839621
Positions:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. Variant got 4 ACMG points: 4P and 0B. PM2PP3_Moderate
The NM_006736.6(DNAJB2):c.71G>A(p.Arg24Gln) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000342 in 1,461,548 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★).
Frequency
Genomes: not found (cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0000034 ( 0 hom. )
Consequence
DNAJB2
NM_006736.6 missense
NM_006736.6 missense
Scores
4
13
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 6.79
Genes affected
DNAJB2 (HGNC:5228): (DnaJ heat shock protein family (Hsp40) member B2) This gene is almost exclusively expressed in the brain, mainly in the neuronal layers. It encodes a protein that shows sequence similarity to bacterial DnaJ protein and the yeast homologs. In bacteria, this protein is implicated in protein folding and protein complex dissociation. Alternatively spliced transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been described for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2011]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Uncertain_significance. Variant got 4 ACMG points.
PM2
Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage;
PP3
MetaRNN computational evidence supports a deleterious effect, 0.886
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DNAJB2 | NM_006736.6 | c.71G>A | p.Arg24Gln | missense_variant | 3/9 | ENST00000336576.10 | NP_006727.2 | |
DNAJB2 | NM_001039550.2 | c.71G>A | p.Arg24Gln | missense_variant | 3/10 | NP_001034639.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DNAJB2 | ENST00000336576.10 | c.71G>A | p.Arg24Gln | missense_variant | 3/9 | 1 | NM_006736.6 | ENSP00000338019 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
Cov.:
32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00000398 AC: 1AN: 251154Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 135784
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
1
AN:
251154
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
0
AN XY:
135784
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000342 AC: 5AN: 1461548Hom.: 0 Cov.: 30 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 727082
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
5
AN:
1461548
Hom.:
Cov.:
30
AF XY:
AC XY:
0
AN XY:
727082
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 32
GnomAD4 genome
Cov.:
32
ExAC
AF:
AC:
1
ClinVar
Significance: Uncertain significance
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1
Revision: criteria provided, single submitter
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
Neuronopathy, distal hereditary motor, autosomal recessive 5 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Feb 17, 2018 | The frequency data for this variant in the population databases is considered unreliable, as metrics indicate poor data quality at this position in the ExAC database. In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. Algorithms developed to predict the effect of missense changes on protein structure and function do not agree on the potential impact of this missense change (SIFT: "Deleterious"; PolyPhen-2: "Possibly Damaging"; Align-GVGD: "Class C0"). This variant has not been reported in the literature in individuals with DNAJB2-related disease. This sequence change replaces arginine with glutamine at codon 24 of the DNAJB2 protein (p.Arg24Gln). The arginine residue is highly conserved and there is a small physicochemical difference between arginine and glutamine. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Pathogenic
BayesDel_addAF
Uncertain
D
BayesDel_noAF
Uncertain
CADD
Pathogenic
DANN
Pathogenic
DEOGEN2
Benign
T;T;.;T;T;.;T
Eigen
Uncertain
Eigen_PC
Uncertain
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
D
LIST_S2
Pathogenic
D;D;D;D;D;D;D
M_CAP
Uncertain
D
MetaRNN
Pathogenic
D;D;D;D;D;D;D
MetaSVM
Uncertain
T
MutationAssessor
Uncertain
M;.;M;.;.;.;.
MutationTaster
Benign
D;D
PrimateAI
Uncertain
T
PROVEAN
Uncertain
D;D;D;D;D;D;D
REVEL
Uncertain
Sift
Uncertain
D;D;D;D;D;D;D
Sift4G
Uncertain
D;D;D;D;D;D;D
Polyphen
D;.;D;.;.;.;.
Vest4
MutPred
Loss of MoRF binding (P = 0.0382);Loss of MoRF binding (P = 0.0382);Loss of MoRF binding (P = 0.0382);Loss of MoRF binding (P = 0.0382);Loss of MoRF binding (P = 0.0382);Loss of MoRF binding (P = 0.0382);Loss of MoRF binding (P = 0.0382);
MVP
MPC
ClinPred
D
GERP RS
RBP_binding_hub_radar
RBP_regulation_power_radar
Varity_R
gMVP
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at