rs78108426
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1
The NM_000246.4(CIITA):c.2072C>A(p.Ala691Asp) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0137 in 1,614,164 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 573 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/18 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. A691V) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000246.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CIITA | NM_000246.4 | c.2072C>A | p.Ala691Asp | missense_variant | 11/20 | ENST00000324288.14 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CIITA | ENST00000324288.14 | c.2072C>A | p.Ala691Asp | missense_variant | 11/20 | 1 | NM_000246.4 | P4 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes ? AF: 0.0170 AC: 2588AN: 152174Hom.: 58 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0223 AC: 5606AN: 251120Hom.: 194 AF XY: 0.0221 AC XY: 2999AN XY: 135824
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0134 AC: 19573AN: 1461872Hom.: 515 Cov.: 70 AF XY: 0.0140 AC XY: 10193AN XY: 727236
GnomAD4 genome ? AF: 0.0170 AC: 2583AN: 152292Hom.: 58 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.0175 AC XY: 1307AN XY: 74476
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
MHC class II deficiency Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Natera, Inc. | Sep 16, 2020 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Invitae | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
not specified Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine | Mar 28, 2016 | Variant identified in a genome or exome case(s) and assessed due to predicted null impact of the variant or pathogenic assertions in the literature or databases. Disclaimer: This variant has not undergone full assessment. The following are preliminary notes: Frequency - |
CIITA-related disorder Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | Sep 23, 2019 | This variant is classified as benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at