Menu
GeneBe

rs78108426

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1

The NM_000246.4(CIITA):c.2072C>A(p.Ala691Asp) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0137 in 1,614,164 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 573 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/18 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. A691V) has been classified as Uncertain significance.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.017 ( 58 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.013 ( 515 hom. )

Consequence

CIITA
NM_000246.4 missense

Scores

2
11

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:5

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.966
Variant links:
Genes affected
CIITA (HGNC:7067): (class II major histocompatibility complex transactivator) This gene encodes a protein with an acidic transcriptional activation domain, 4 LRRs (leucine-rich repeats) and a GTP binding domain. The protein is located in the nucleus and acts as a positive regulator of class II major histocompatibility complex gene transcription, and is referred to as the "master control factor" for the expression of these genes. The protein also binds GTP and uses GTP binding to facilitate its own transport into the nucleus. Once in the nucleus it does not bind DNA but rather uses an intrinsic acetyltransferase (AT) activity to act in a coactivator-like fashion. Mutations in this gene have been associated with bare lymphocyte syndrome type II (also known as hereditary MHC class II deficiency or HLA class II-deficient combined immunodeficiency), increased susceptibility to rheumatoid arthritis, multiple sclerosis, and possibly myocardial infarction. Several transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Nov 2013]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.0023306608).
BP6
Variant 16-10907564-C-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr16-10907564-C-A is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 317702.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr16-10907564-C-A is described in Lovd as [Benign]. Variant chr16-10907564-C-A is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (EAS) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.123 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
CIITANM_000246.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.2072C>A p.Ala691Asp missense_variant 11/20 ENST00000324288.14

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
CIITAENST00000324288.14 linkuse as main transcriptc.2072C>A p.Ala691Asp missense_variant 11/201 NM_000246.4 P4

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0170
AC:
2588
AN:
152174
Hom.:
58
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0194
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.0307
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0181
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.0176
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.131
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.0337
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00320
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.0253
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00703
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.0268
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.0223
AC:
5606
AN:
251120
Hom.:
194
AF XY:
0.0221
AC XY:
2999
AN XY:
135824
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0208
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0150
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.0159
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.134
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.0307
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00601
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00817
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.0197
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0134
AC:
19573
AN:
1461872
Hom.:
515
Cov.:
70
AF XY:
0.0140
AC XY:
10193
AN XY:
727236
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.0192
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.0163
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.0163
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.133
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0300
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00581
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00747
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.0200
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0170
AC:
2583
AN:
152292
Hom.:
58
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.0175
AC XY:
1307
AN XY:
74476
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.0194
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.0180
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.0176
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.131
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.0336
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00320
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00701
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.0265
Alfa
AF:
0.0124
Hom.:
86
Bravo
AF:
0.0191
TwinsUK
AF:
0.00890
AC:
33
ALSPAC
AF:
0.00701
AC:
27
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.0191
AC:
84
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.00605
AC:
52
ExAC
AF:
0.0220
AC:
2673
Asia WGS
AF:
0.0920
AC:
317
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.00938
EpiControl
AF:
0.00848

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:5
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

MHC class II deficiency Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 12, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingNatera, Inc.Sep 16, 2020- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeFeb 01, 2024- -
not specified Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLaboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized MedicineMar 28, 2016Variant identified in a genome or exome case(s) and assessed due to predicted null impact of the variant or pathogenic assertions in the literature or databases. Disclaimer: This variant has not undergone full assessment. The following are preliminary notes: Frequency -
CIITA-related disorder Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact SciencesSep 23, 2019This variant is classified as benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.15
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.50
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.38
Cadd
Benign
19
Dann
Uncertain
0.99
Eigen
Benign
-0.31
Eigen_PC
Benign
-0.34
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.14
N
LIST_S2
Benign
0.82
T;T
MetaRNN
Benign
0.0023
T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.92
T
MutationTaster
Benign
1.0
P;P
PrimateAI
Benign
0.35
T
Sift4G
Uncertain
0.019
D;D
Vest4
0.54
MPC
0.33
ClinPred
0.0066
T
GERP RS
3.3
gMVP
0.56

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs78108426; hg19: chr16-11001421; COSMIC: COSV60858376; COSMIC: COSV60858376; API