rs781104363
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. The variant received 0 ACMG points: 2P and 2B. PM2BP4_Moderate
The NM_003954.5(MAP3K14):c.1651C>T(p.Leu551Phe) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000000686 in 1,458,044 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 11/17 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. No clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar. Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. L551V) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_003954.5 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- NIK deficiencyInheritance: AR Classification: MODERATE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet, ClinGen
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Uncertain_significance. The variant received 0 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MAP3K14 | NM_003954.5 | c.1651C>T | p.Leu551Phe | missense_variant | Exon 9 of 16 | ENST00000344686.8 | NP_003945.2 | |
| MAP3K14 | XM_047436997.1 | c.1651C>T | p.Leu551Phe | missense_variant | Exon 9 of 15 | XP_047292953.1 | ||
| MAP3K14 | XM_047436998.1 | c.1651C>T | p.Leu551Phe | missense_variant | Exon 10 of 16 | XP_047292954.1 | ||
| MAP3K14 | XM_011525441.3 | c.1651C>T | p.Leu551Phe | missense_variant | Exon 10 of 17 | XP_011523743.1 |
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 32
GnomAD4 exome AF: 6.86e-7 AC: 1AN: 1458044Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 724694 show subpopulations ⚠️ The allele balance in gnomAD version 4 Exomes is significantly skewed from the expected value of 0.5.
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 32
ClinVar
Not reported inComputational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at