rs781381539

Variant names:

Your query was ambiguous. Multiple possible variants found:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -1 ACMG points: 2P and 3B. PM1BP4_ModerateBS1_Supporting

The NM_006096.4(NDRG1):c.4T>G(p.Ser2Ala) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000805 in 1,614,020 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/22 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. S2P) has been classified as Uncertain significance.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0000066 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.0000082 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

NDRG1
NM_006096.4 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Uncertain significance criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts U:4

Conservation

PhyloP100: 2.36

Publications

1 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

NDRG1 (HGNC:7679): (N-myc downstream regulated 1) This gene is a member of the N-myc downregulated gene family which belongs to the alpha/beta hydrolase superfamily. The protein encoded by this gene is a cytoplasmic protein involved in stress responses, hormone responses, cell growth, and differentiation. The encoded protein is necessary for p53-mediated caspase activation and apoptosis. Mutations in this gene are a cause of Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 4D, and expression of this gene may be a prognostic indicator for several types of cancer. Alternatively spliced transcript variants encoding multiple isoforms have been observed for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, May 2012]

NDRG1 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 4D
Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Illumina

NDRG1 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -1 ACMG points.

PM1

In a modified_residue Phosphoserine (size 0) in uniprot entity NDRG1_HUMAN

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.18243709).

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population eas. GnomAdExome4 allele frequency = 0.00000821 (12/1461890) while in subpopulation EAS AF = 0.000302 (12/39700). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.000173. There are 0 homozygotes in GnomAdExome4. There are 6 alleles in the male GnomAdExome4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position passed quality control check. Existence of Clinvar submissions makes me limit the strength of this signal to Supporting

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
NDRG1	NM_006096.4 link	c.4T>G	p.Ser2Ala	missense_variant	Exon 2 of 16	ENST00000323851.13	NP_006087.2	Q92597-1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
NDRG1	ENST00000323851.13 link	c.4T>G	p.Ser2Ala	missense_variant	Exon 2 of 16	1	NM_006096.4	ENSP00000319977.8		Q92597-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.00000657

AC:

AN:

152130

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.000193

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.00

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.0000199

AC:

AN:

251476

AF XY:

0.0000147

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.000272

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.00000821

AC:

AN:

1461890

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00000825

AC XY:

AN XY:

727248

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

33480

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

44724

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

26136

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.000302

AC:

AN:

39700

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

86258

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

53418

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5768

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

1112012

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

60394

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.483

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.00000657

AC:

AN:

152130

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000135

AC XY:

AN XY:

74310

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

41416

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

15266

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3466

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.000193

AC:

AN:

5184

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

4828

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10614

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

316

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

68036

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

2092

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.425

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.00

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.00000378

ExAC

AF:

0.00000824

AC:

ClinVar

Significance: Uncertain significance

Submissions summary: Uncertain:4

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 4D

Uncertain:2

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Jan 30, 2020

Natera, Inc.

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease

Uncertain:1

Molecular Genetics Laboratory, London Health Sciences Centre

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 4

Uncertain:1

Jan 06, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This sequence change replaces serine, which is neutral and polar, with alanine, which is neutral and non-polar, at codon 2 of the NDRG1 protein (p.Ser2Ala). This variant is present in population databases (rs781381539, gnomAD 0.03%). This missense change has been observed in individual(s) with Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease (PMID: 32376792). ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 910371). An algorithm developed to predict the effect of missense changes on protein structure and function (PolyPhen-2) suggests that this variant¬†is likely to be tolerated. In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Benign

0.079

BayesDel_addAF

Benign

-0.31

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.39

CADD

Benign

(source)

DANN

Uncertain

0.99

DEOGEN2

Benign

0.18

T;T;T;T;.;T;.;.;T;.;T

Eigen

Benign

-0.15

Eigen_PC

Benign

-0.013

FATHMM_MKL

Uncertain

0.76

LIST_S2

Benign

0.47

.;T;T;T;T;T;.;T;T;T;T

M_CAP

Benign

0.0062

MetaRNN

Benign

0.18

T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T

MetaSVM

Benign

-1.1

MutationAssessor

Benign

0.41

N;N;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.

PhyloP100

2.4

PrimateAI

Uncertain

0.54

PROVEAN

Benign

-0.20

N;N;N;N;N;N;N;N;N;N;N

REVEL

Benign

0.043

Sift

Benign

0.043

D;D;D;T;D;D;T;T;T;D;D

Sift4G

Benign

0.21

T;T;D;D;.;T;T;T;.;.;D

Polyphen

0.0030

B;B;P;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.

Vest4

0.39

MutPred

0.25

Loss of phosphorylation at S2 (P = 0.0065);Loss of phosphorylation at S2 (P = 0.0065);Loss of phosphorylation at S2 (P = 0.0065);Loss of phosphorylation at S2 (P = 0.0065);.;Loss of phosphorylation at S2 (P = 0.0065);Loss of phosphorylation at S2 (P = 0.0065);Loss of phosphorylation at S2 (P = 0.0065);.;Loss of phosphorylation at S2 (P = 0.0065);.;

MVP

0.42

MPC

0.25

ClinPred

0.18

GERP RS

3.8

PromoterAI

0.0024

Neutral

(source)

Varity_R

0.050

gMVP

0.57

Mutation Taster

=281/19

polymorphism

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over