rs781427897
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. The variant received 1 ACMG points: 1P and 0B. PM2_Supporting
This summary comes from the ClinGen Evidence Repository: The c.363C>A variant is <1/50,000 alleles (0.002%, 2/113,262 alleles) in the non-Finnish European gnomAD subpopulation (PM2_Supporting; http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org). No additional evidence met criteria for consideration. Therefore, the clinical significance of this variant is uncertain. ACMG/AMP criteria applied, as specified by the CDH1 Variant Curation Expert Panel (Variant Interpretation Guidelines Version 3.1): PM2_Supporting. LINK:https://erepo.genome.network/evrepo/ui/classification/CA8129833/MONDO:0007648/007
Frequency
Consequence
NM_004360.5 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- blepharocheilodontic syndrome 1Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, MODERATE Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, Illumina, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P
- CDH1-related diffuse gastric and lobular breast cancer syndromeInheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), ClinGen, G2P
- hereditary breast carcinomaInheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: Ambry Genetics
- hereditary diffuse gastric adenocarcinomaInheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, Orphanet
- cleft soft palateInheritance: AD Classification: MODERATE Submitted by: Ambry Genetics
- orofacial cleft 3Inheritance: AD Classification: MODERATE Submitted by: Ambry Genetics
- blepharocheilodontic syndromeInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
- familial ovarian cancerInheritance: AD Classification: NO_KNOWN Submitted by: ClinGen
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Uncertain_significance. The variant received 1 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CDH1 | NM_004360.5 | c.363C>A | p.His121Gln | missense_variant | Exon 3 of 16 | ENST00000261769.10 | NP_004351.1 | |
| CDH1 | NM_001317184.2 | c.363C>A | p.His121Gln | missense_variant | Exon 3 of 15 | NP_001304113.1 | ||
| CDH1 | NM_001317185.2 | c.-1253C>A | 5_prime_UTR_variant | Exon 3 of 16 | NP_001304114.1 | |||
| CDH1 | NM_001317186.2 | c.-1457C>A | 5_prime_UTR_variant | Exon 3 of 15 | NP_001304115.1 |
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 32
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.00000797 AC: 2AN: 250886 AF XY: 0.00000737 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000274 AC: 4AN: 1461716Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00000138 AC XY: 1AN XY: 727180 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 32
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Hereditary diffuse gastric adenocarcinoma Uncertain:1
In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. Algorithms developed to predict the effect of missense changes on protein structure and function output the following: SIFT: "Tolerated"; PolyPhen-2: "Benign"; Align-GVGD: "Class C0". The glutamine amino acid residue is found in multiple mammalian species, suggesting that this missense change does not adversely affect protein function. These predictions have not been confirmed by published functional studies and their clinical significance is uncertain. This variant has not been reported in the literature in individuals with CDH1-related disease. This variant is present in population databases (rs781427897, ExAC 0.003%). This sequence change replaces histidine with glutamine at codon 121 of the CDH1 protein (p.His121Gln). The histidine residue is moderately conserved and there is a small physicochemical difference between histidine and glutamine. -
CDH1-related diffuse gastric and lobular breast cancer syndrome Uncertain:1
The c.363C>A variant is <1/50,000 alleles (0.002%, 2/113,262 alleles) in the non-Finnish European gnomAD subpopulation (PM2_Supporting; http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org). No additional evidence met criteria for consideration. Therefore, the clinical significance of this variant is uncertain. ACMG/AMP criteria applied, as specified by the CDH1 Variant Curation Expert Panel (Variant Interpretation Guidelines Version 3.1): PM2_Supporting. -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at