rs78165942

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_001035.3(RYR2):​c.2397-6C>T variant causes a splice region, intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00248 in 1,596,156 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 71 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 3/3 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0099 ( 28 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0017 ( 43 hom. )

Consequence

RYR2
NM_001035.3 splice_region, intron

Scores

2
Splicing: ADA: 0.00004965
2

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:15

Conservation

PhyloP100: 1.76

Publications

3 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
RYR2 (HGNC:10484): (ryanodine receptor 2) This gene encodes a ryanodine receptor found in cardiac muscle sarcoplasmic reticulum. The encoded protein is one of the components of a calcium channel, composed of a tetramer of the ryanodine receptor proteins and a tetramer of FK506 binding protein 1B proteins, that supplies calcium to cardiac muscle. Mutations in this gene are associated with stress-induced polymorphic ventricular tachycardia and arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
RYR2 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia 2
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, NO_KNOWN Submitted by: Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Ambry Genetics
  • catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet, ClinGen, G2P
  • catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia 1
    Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
  • hypertrophic cardiomyopathy
    Inheritance: AD Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: ClinGen
  • arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy
    Inheritance: AD Classification: NO_KNOWN Submitted by: ClinGen

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.79).
BP6
Variant 1-237503283-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr1-237503283-C-T is described in ClinVar as Benign/Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 43758.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.0099 (1507/152242) while in subpopulation AFR AF = 0.0323 (1341/41520). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0309. There are 28 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 725 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position passed quality control check.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 1507 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
RYR2NM_001035.3 linkc.2397-6C>T splice_region_variant, intron_variant Intron 21 of 104 ENST00000366574.7 NP_001026.2 Q92736-1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
RYR2ENST00000366574.7 linkc.2397-6C>T splice_region_variant, intron_variant Intron 21 of 104 1 NM_001035.3 ENSP00000355533.2 Q92736-1
RYR2ENST00000661330.2 linkc.2397-6C>T splice_region_variant, intron_variant Intron 21 of 105 ENSP00000499393.2 A0A590UJF6
RYR2ENST00000609119.2 linkn.2397-6C>T splice_region_variant, intron_variant Intron 21 of 103 5 ENSP00000499659.2 A0A590UK06

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00990
AC:
1506
AN:
152124
Hom.:
28
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0323
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00583
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.000385
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00911
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00316
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000118
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.0124
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.00371
AC:
817
AN:
220452
AF XY:
0.00344
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0328
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00183
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.000444
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.0000493
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000143
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00308
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00170
AC:
2455
AN:
1443914
Hom.:
43
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.00186
AC XY:
1333
AN XY:
716550
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0345
AC:
1143
AN:
33122
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00231
AC:
95
AN:
41064
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
25754
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.000102
AC:
4
AN:
39080
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.0108
AC:
907
AN:
84040
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.0000381
AC:
2
AN:
52522
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00348
AC:
20
AN:
5746
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0000807
AC:
89
AN:
1102696
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00326
AC:
195
AN:
59890
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.499
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
126
252
379
505
631
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
54
108
162
216
270
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00990
AC:
1507
AN:
152242
Hom.:
28
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00974
AC XY:
725
AN XY:
74446
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0323
AC:
1341
AN:
41520
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00582
AC:
89
AN:
15284
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
3468
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.000386
AC:
2
AN:
5178
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00849
AC:
41
AN:
4828
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
10598
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00340
AC:
1
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.000118
AC:
8
AN:
68046
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.0118
AC:
25
AN:
2114
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.501
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
74
148
223
297
371
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
20
40
60
80
100
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.00623
Hom.:
10
Bravo
AF:
0.0108
Asia WGS
AF:
0.0120
AC:
43
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:15
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:7
-
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Apr 09, 2025
Molecular Diagnostic Laboratory for Inherited Cardiovascular Disease, Montreal Heart Institute
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Apr 24, 2012
Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

2397-6C>T in Intron 21 of RYR2: This variant is not expected to have clinical si gnificance because it is not located within the conserved +/- 1, 2 invariant reg ion. It has been identified in 3.8% (116/3076) of African American chromosomes f rom a broad population by the NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project (http://evs.gs.wash ington.edu/EVS/; rs78165942). -

Jan 25, 2013
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

-
Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not provided Benign:3
-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

- -

-
Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Oct 25, 2024
ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Cardiomyopathy Benign:2
Aug 02, 2016
CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Mar 09, 2018
Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia 1 Benign:2
Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Feb 03, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia 2 Benign:1
Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.79
CADD
Benign
1.6
DANN
Benign
0.51
PhyloP100
1.8
Mutation Taster
=88/12
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
dbscSNV1_ADA
Benign
0.000050
dbscSNV1_RF
Benign
0.0080
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs78165942; hg19: chr1-237666583; API