rs782099994
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. Variant got 3 ACMG points: 3P and 0B. PM2PP3
The NM_002900.3(RBP3):c.3581C>T(p.Thr1194Met) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000291 in 1,614,084 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_002900.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Uncertain_significance. Variant got 3 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00000657 AC: 1AN: 152246Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00000796 AC: 2AN: 251332Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.00000736 AC XY: 1AN XY: 135856
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000315 AC: 46AN: 1461838Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.0000344 AC XY: 25AN XY: 727220
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00000657 AC: 1AN: 152246Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.0000134 AC XY: 1AN XY: 74396
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Uncertain:1
In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. An algorithm developed to predict the effect of missense changes on protein structure and function (PolyPhen-2) suggests that this variant is likely to be disruptive. ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 208325). This missense change has been observed in individual(s) with Leber congenital amaurosis and/or other retinal degeneration (PMID: 19074801) (PMID: 19074801). This variant is present in population databases (rs782099994, gnomAD 0.002%). This sequence change replaces threonine, which is neutral and polar, with methionine, which is neutral and non-polar, at codon 1194 of the RBP3 protein (p.Thr1194Met). -
Retinitis pigmentosa 66 Uncertain:1
- -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at