rs782119393
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -1 ACMG points: 0P and 1B. BP4
The NM_017868.4(TTC12):c.134T>G(p.Leu45Arg) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000217 in 1,613,440 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_017868.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- ciliary dyskinesia, primary, 45Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, MODERATE Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P, ClinGen, Ambry Genetics
- primary ciliary dyskinesiaInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -1 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_017868.4. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
RefSeq Transcripts
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TTC12 | TSL:2 MANE Select | c.134T>G | p.Leu45Arg | missense | Exon 3 of 22 | ENSP00000433757.1 | Q9H892-1 | ||
| TTC12 | TSL:1 | c.134T>G | p.Leu45Arg | missense | Exon 2 of 22 | ENSP00000315160.3 | Q9H892-2 | ||
| TTC12 | TSL:1 | n.134T>G | non_coding_transcript_exon | Exon 3 of 23 | ENSP00000435291.1 | Q9H892-2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00000657 AC: 1AN: 152170Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.00000797 AC: 2AN: 250850 AF XY: 0.00 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000233 AC: 34AN: 1461270Hom.: 0 Cov.: 30 AF XY: 0.0000151 AC XY: 11AN XY: 726956 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00000657 AC: 1AN: 152170Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 74350 show subpopulations
ClinVar
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at