rs78353028
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -5 ACMG points: 0P and 5B. BP4BS1
This summary comes from the ClinGen Evidence Repository: NM_000552.5(VWF):c.7997C>T is a missense variant that substitutes threonine for methionine at position 2666. The Grpmax filtering allele frequency in gnomAD v4.0 is 0.06826 (based on 5238/74998 alleles in the African/African American population) which is higher than the ClinGen VWD VCEP threshold (>0.01) for BS1, and therefore meets this criterion (BS1). While this variant has been observed in healthy control individuals (PMID:22197721), BS2 is not being used due to penetrance issues. The computational predictor REVEL gives a score of 0.027, which is below the ClinGen VWD VCEP threshold of <0.290 and does not predict a damaging effect on VWF function (BP4). Additionally, the computational splicing predictor SpliceAI indicated that the variant has no impact on splicing. In summary, this variant meets the criteria to be classified as likely benign for von Willebrand disease based on the ACMG/AMP criteria applied, as specified by the ClinGen VWD VCEP: BS1, BP4. LINK:https://erepo.genome.network/evrepo/ui/classification/CA6401422/MONDO:0019565/090
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000552.5 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -5 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VWF | NM_000552.5 | c.7997C>T | p.Thr2666Met | missense_variant | 49/52 | ENST00000261405.10 | NP_000543.3 | |
VWF | XM_047429501.1 | c.7997C>T | p.Thr2666Met | missense_variant | 49/52 | XP_047285457.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VWF | ENST00000261405.10 | c.7997C>T | p.Thr2666Met | missense_variant | 49/52 | 1 | NM_000552.5 | ENSP00000261405 | P1 | |
VWF | ENST00000612016.1 | n.406C>T | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 2/3 | 5 | |||||
VWF | ENST00000621700.1 | n.315C>T | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 4/4 | 3 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0204 AC: 3100AN: 152166Hom.: 97 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00513 AC: 1290AN: 251334Hom.: 40 AF XY: 0.00388 AC XY: 527AN XY: 135826
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00206 AC: 3012AN: 1461530Hom.: 95 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00178 AC XY: 1291AN XY: 727094
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0204 AC: 3099AN: 152284Hom.: 96 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0195 AC XY: 1454AN XY: 74484
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:4
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Nov 29, 2023 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano | Mar 29, 2023 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Center for Pediatric Genomic Medicine, Children's Mercy Hospital and Clinics | Aug 25, 2015 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
von Willebrand disease type 2 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome-Nilou Lab | Dec 05, 2021 | - - |
von Willebrand disease type 3 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome-Nilou Lab | Dec 05, 2021 | - - |
VWF-related disorder Benign:1
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | Mar 19, 2019 | This variant is classified as benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). - |
von Willebrand disease type 1 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome-Nilou Lab | Dec 05, 2021 | - - |
Hereditary von Willebrand disease Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jun 14, 2016 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at