rs7853578

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1

The NM_014290.3(TDRD7):​c.588A>G​(p.Gln196Gln) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0422 in 1,601,674 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 2,330 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.072 ( 625 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.039 ( 1705 hom. )

Consequence

TDRD7
NM_014290.3 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:5

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.193

Publications

9 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
TDRD7 (HGNC:30831): (tudor domain containing 7) The protein encoded by this gene belongs to the Tudor family of proteins. This protein contains conserved Tudor domains and LOTUS domains. It is a component of RNA granules, which function in RNA processing. Mutations in this gene have been associated with cataract formation in mouse and human. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, Nov 2014]
TDRD7 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • cataract 36
    Inheritance: AR Classification: STRONG, MODERATE Submitted by: G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.83).
BP6
Variant 9-97439269-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr9-97439269-A-G is described in ClinVar as Benign. ClinVar VariationId is 260384.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.193 with no splicing effect.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AFR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.158 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
TDRD7NM_014290.3 linkc.588A>G p.Gln196Gln synonymous_variant Exon 5 of 17 ENST00000355295.5 NP_055105.2
TDRD7NM_001302884.2 linkc.366A>G p.Gln122Gln synonymous_variant Exon 4 of 16 NP_001289813.1
TDRD7XM_047423111.1 linkc.588A>G p.Gln196Gln synonymous_variant Exon 5 of 17 XP_047279067.1
TDRD7XM_047423113.1 linkc.588A>G p.Gln196Gln synonymous_variant Exon 5 of 14 XP_047279069.1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
TDRD7ENST00000355295.5 linkc.588A>G p.Gln196Gln synonymous_variant Exon 5 of 17 1 NM_014290.3 ENSP00000347444.4

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0717
AC:
10885
AN:
151748
Hom.:
614
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.161
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0367
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.0311
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.104
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.0759
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.0378
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.0222
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0315
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.0560
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.0505
AC:
12344
AN:
244230
AF XY:
0.0500
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.164
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0209
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.0282
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.108
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.0341
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0320
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.0391
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0391
AC:
56720
AN:
1449810
Hom.:
1705
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0400
AC XY:
28862
AN XY:
721612
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.161
AC:
5348
AN:
33304
American (AMR)
AF:
0.0225
AC:
1004
AN:
44656
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.0297
AC:
775
AN:
26086
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.0849
AC:
3363
AN:
39634
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.0778
AC:
6696
AN:
86014
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.0337
AC:
1470
AN:
43654
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.0424
AC:
244
AN:
5756
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0315
AC:
34963
AN:
1110510
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.0475
AC:
2857
AN:
60196
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.442
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
2538
5076
7614
10152
12690
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
1472
2944
4416
5888
7360
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0720
AC:
10930
AN:
151864
Hom.:
625
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0722
AC XY:
5358
AN XY:
74222
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.162
AC:
6691
AN:
41408
American (AMR)
AF:
0.0367
AC:
559
AN:
15230
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.0311
AC:
108
AN:
3470
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.104
AC:
539
AN:
5174
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.0762
AC:
367
AN:
4818
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.0378
AC:
397
AN:
10510
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.0204
AC:
6
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0315
AC:
2143
AN:
67940
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.0569
AC:
120
AN:
2110
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.499
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
490
980
1470
1960
2450
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
130
260
390
520
650
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.0531
Hom.:
118
Bravo
AF:
0.0749
Asia WGS
AF:
0.0830
AC:
287
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.0312
EpiControl
AF:
0.0308

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:5
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Cataract 36 Benign:2
Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease.

Jan 31, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

not provided Benign:2
May 31, 2018
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease.

Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

not specified Benign:1
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.83
CADD
Benign
0.34
DANN
Benign
0.23
PhyloP100
-0.19
Mutation Taster
=100/0
polymorphism (auto)

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.010
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs7853578; hg19: chr9-100201551; COSMIC: COSV107439863; API