rs78592085
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -9 ACMG points: 0P and 9B. BP4_StrongBS1_SupportingBS2
The NM_001164507.2(NEB):c.25367C>T(p.Thr8456Met) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0025 in 1,612,568 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 10 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. T8456T) has been classified as Likely benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001164507.2 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -9 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NEB | ENST00000397345.8 | c.25367C>T | p.Thr8456Met | missense_variant | Exon 181 of 182 | 5 | NM_001164508.2 | ENSP00000380505.3 | ||
| NEB | ENST00000427231.7 | c.25367C>T | p.Thr8456Met | missense_variant | Exon 181 of 182 | 5 | NM_001164507.2 | ENSP00000416578.2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00204 AC: 311AN: 152132Hom.: 4 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.00196 AC: 489AN: 248872 AF XY: 0.00186 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00255 AC: 3725AN: 1460318Hom.: 7 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00248 AC XY: 1803AN XY: 726530 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00203 AC: 309AN: 152250Hom.: 3 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00180 AC XY: 134AN XY: 74452 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Uncertain:2Benign:4
- -
- -
- -
NEB: BS2 -
- -
BS1 -
Nemaline myopathy 2 Uncertain:2Benign:2
This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -
- -
- -
This variant was classified as: Uncertain significance. -
not specified Uncertain:2
- -
The T8491M variants in the NEB gene has not been reported previously as a pathogenic variant, nor as a benign variant, to our knowledge. While not present in the homozygous state, the NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project reports T8491M was observed in 22/8232 (0.3%) alleles from individuals of European American background and the 1000 Genomes Project reports this variant was observed in 2/214 (0.9%) alleles from individuals of Italian ancestry, indicating it may be a rare variant in these populations. The T8491M variant is a non-conservative amino acid substitution, which is likely to impact secondary protein structure as these residues differ in polarity, charge, size and/or other properties. This substitution occurs at a position that is conserved across species, and in silico analysis predicts this variant is probably damaging to the protein structure/function. We interpret T8491M as a variant of uncertain significance. -
Muscle weakness;C0699743:Congenital muscular dystrophy Uncertain:1
- -
NEB-related disorder Benign:1
This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at