rs786201262

Variant names:

• chr16-68738398-C-A
• rs786201262
• NM_004360.5:c.150C>A

Your query was ambiguous. Multiple possible variants found:

• chr16-68738398-C-A
• chr16-68738398-C-G
• chr16-68738398-C-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -5 ACMG points: 1P and 6B. PM2_Supporting BS2 BP4 BP7

This summary comes from the ClinGen Evidence Repository: The c.150C>A (p.Arg50=) results in a synonymous amino acid change in exon 2. This variant was found in 1 of 153,336 alleles in gnomAD (0.00001) (PM2_Supporting; http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org). However, This variant has also been observed in more than 10 individuals without DGC, SRC tumours or LBC and whose families do not suggest HDGC (BS2; SCV000665066.2; SCV000288437.6; SCV000976762.1). This variant occurs at a position that is poorly conserved and multiple computational tools predict that this variant does not impact splicing (BP4, BP7). In summary, this variant meets criteria to be classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP criteria applied as specified by the CDH1 Variant Curation Expert Panel: BS2, BP4, BP7, PM2_Supporting. LINK:https://erepo.genome.network/evrepo/ui/classification/CA10583402/MONDO:0007648/007

• Frequency:
  • Genomes: 𝑓 0.000013 (0 hom., cov: 32)
  • Exomes 𝑓: 0.0000036 (0 hom.)
• Consequence: CDH1 NM_004360.5 synonymous
• Clinical Significance: Likely benign reviewed by expert panel U:1 B:10
• Conservation: PhyloP100: -1.61

Genes affected

CDH1 (HGNC:1748): (cadherin 1) This gene encodes a classical cadherin of the cadherin superfamily. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants, at least one of which encodes a preproprotein that is proteolytically processed to generate the mature glycoprotein. This calcium-dependent cell-cell adhesion protein is comprised of five extracellular cadherin repeats, a transmembrane region and a highly conserved cytoplasmic tail. Mutations in this gene are correlated with gastric, breast, colorectal, thyroid and ovarian cancer. Loss of function of this gene is thought to contribute to cancer progression by increasing proliferation, invasion, and/or metastasis. The ectodomain of this protein mediates bacterial adhesion to mammalian cells and the cytoplasmic domain is required for internalization. This gene is present in a gene cluster with other members of the cadherin family on chromosome 16. [provided by RefSeq, Nov 2015]

ACMG classification

Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -5 ACMG points.

• PM2: For more information check the summary or visit ClinGen Evidence Repository.
• BP4: For more information check the summary or visit ClinGen Evidence Repository.
• BP7: For more information check the summary or visit ClinGen Evidence Repository.
• BS2: For more information check the summary or visit ClinGen Evidence Repository.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
CDH1	NM_004360.5	c.150C>A	p.Arg50Arg	synonymous_variant	Exon 2 of 16	ENST00000261769.10	NP_004351.1
CDH1	NM_001317184.2	c.150C>A	p.Arg50Arg	synonymous_variant	Exon 2 of 15		NP_001304113.1
CDH1	NM_001317185.2	c.-1466C>A		5_prime_UTR_variant	Exon 2 of 16		NP_001304114.1
CDH1	NM_001317186.2	c.-1670C>A		5_prime_UTR_variant	Exon 2 of 15		NP_001304115.1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
CDH1	ENST00000261769.10	c.150C>A	p.Arg50Arg	synonymous_variant	Exon 2 of 16	1	NM_004360.5	ENSP00000261769.4
CDH1	ENST00000422392.6	c.150C>A	p.Arg50Arg	synonymous_variant	Exon 2 of 15	1		ENSP00000414946.2
CDH1	ENST00000566612.5	n.150C>A		non_coding_transcript_exon_variant	Exon 2 of 15	1		ENSP00000454782.1
CDH1	ENST00000566510.5	n.150C>A		non_coding_transcript_exon_variant	Exon 2 of 15	5		ENSP00000458139.1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000131 AC: 2 AN: 152188 Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32

Gnomad AFR AF: 0.00

Gnomad AMI AF: 0.00

Gnomad AMR AF: 0.00

Gnomad ASJ AF: 0.00

Gnomad EAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad SAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad FIN AF: 0.00

Gnomad MID AF: 0.00

Gnomad NFE AF: 0.0000294

Gnomad OTH AF: 0.00

GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00000652 AC: 1 AN: 153336 Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.0000123 AC XY: 1 AN XY: 81272

Gnomad AFR exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad AMR exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad ASJ exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad EAS exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad SAS exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad FIN exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad NFE exome AF: 0.0000170

Gnomad OTH exome AF: 0.00

GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000358 AC: 5 AN: 1396502 Hom.: 0 Cov.: 30 AF XY: 0.00000290 AC XY: 2 AN XY: 688634

Gnomad4 AFR exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 AMR exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 ASJ exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 FIN exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome AF: 0.00000371

Gnomad4 OTH exome AF: 0.0000173

GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000131 AC: 2 AN: 152188 Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000269 AC XY: 2 AN XY: 74354

Gnomad4 AFR AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 AMR AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 ASJ AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 EAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 SAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 FIN AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 NFE AF: 0.0000294

Gnomad4 OTH AF: 0.00

Alfa AF: 0.0000195 Hom.: 0

Bravo AF: 0.0000264

ClinVar

Significance: Likely benign

Submissions summary: Uncertain:1 Benign:10

Revision: reviewed by expert panel

Submissions by phenotype

Hereditary diffuse gastric adenocarcinoma Uncertain:1 Benign:3

Aug 01, 2022

European Reference Network on Genetic Tumour Risk Syndromes (ERN-GENTURIS), i3s - Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde, University of Porto

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

PM2; BS2; BP7; BP4 (PMID: 30311375) -

Sep 11, 2024

Myriad Genetics, Inc.

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is considered benign. This variant is a silent/synonymous amino acid change and it is not expected to impact splicing. -

Jun 15, 2024

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

not provided Benign:2

Apr 01, 2019

CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Apr 17, 2018

GeneDx

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:2

Jun 22, 2017

Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jan 15, 2016

Ambry Genetics

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

not specified Benign:1

Aug 28, 2019

Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

CDH1-related disorder Benign:1

Sep 01, 2020

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

CDH1-related diffuse gastric and lobular breast cancer syndrome Benign:1

Aug 18, 2023

ClinGen CDH1 Variant Curation Expert Panel

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: reviewed by expert panel

Collection Method: curation

The c.150C>A (p.Arg50=) results in a synonymous amino acid change in exon 2. This variant was found in 1 of 153,336 alleles in gnomAD (0.00001) (PM2_Supporting; http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org). However, This variant has also been observed in more than 10 individuals without DGC, SRC tumours or LBC and whose families do not suggest HDGC (BS2; SCV000665066.2; SCV000288437.6; SCV000976762.1). This variant occurs at a position that is poorly conserved and multiple computational tools predict that this variant does not impact splicing (BP4, BP7). In summary, this variant meets criteria to be classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP criteria applied as specified by the CDH1 Variant Curation Expert Panel: BS2, BP4, BP7, PM2_Supporting. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name	Calibrated prediction	Score	Prediction
BayesDel_noAF	Benign	-0.48
CADD	Benign	5.1
DANN	Benign	0.90

Splicing

Name	Calibrated prediction	Score	Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)		0.0		Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs786201262; hg19: chr16-68772301;