rs786202321

Variant names:

Your query was ambiguous. Multiple possible variants found:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -13 ACMG points: 0P and 13B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7

The NM_000179.3(MSH6):c.225G>A(p.Gly75Gly) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000837 in 1,314,198 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. G75G) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: not found (cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.0000084 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

MSH6
NM_000179.3 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:7

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.285

Publications

1 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

MSH6 (HGNC:7329): (mutS homolog 6) This gene encodes a member of the DNA mismatch repair MutS family. In E. coli, the MutS protein helps in the recognition of mismatched nucleotides prior to their repair. A highly conserved region of approximately 150 aa, called the Walker-A adenine nucleotide binding motif, exists in MutS homologs. The encoded protein heterodimerizes with MSH2 to form a mismatch recognition complex that functions as a bidirectional molecular switch that exchanges ADP and ATP as DNA mismatches are bound and dissociated. Mutations in this gene may be associated with hereditary nonpolyposis colon cancer, colorectal cancer, and endometrial cancer. Transcripts variants encoding different isoforms have been described. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2013]

MSH6 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

Lynch syndrome
Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: G2P, ClinGen, Orphanet
Lynch syndrome 5
Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Genomics England PanelApp
mismatch repair cancer syndrome 1
Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: ClinGen, Orphanet
mismatch repair cancer syndrome 3
Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P
ovarian cancer
Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp
malignant pancreatic neoplasm
Inheritance: AD Classification: MODERATE Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp
Muir-Torre syndrome
Inheritance: AD Classification: MODERATE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp, Orphanet
rhabdomyosarcoma
Inheritance: AR Classification: MODERATE Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp
breast cancer
Inheritance: AD Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: Ambry Genetics
prostate cancer
Inheritance: AD Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: Ambry Genetics
hereditary breast carcinoma
Inheritance: AD Classification: NO_KNOWN Submitted by: ClinGen

MSH6 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -13 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.68).

BP6

Variant 2-47783458-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr2-47783458-G-A is described in ClinVar as Benign/Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 185622.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.285 with no splicing effect.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
MSH6	NM_000179.3 link	c.225G>A	p.Gly75Gly	synonymous_variant	Exon 1 of 10	ENST00000234420.11	NP_000170.1	P52701-1Q3SWU9

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
MSH6	ENST00000234420.11 link	c.225G>A	p.Gly75Gly	synonymous_variant	Exon 1 of 10	1	NM_000179.3	ENSP00000234420.5		P52701-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

Cov.:

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.0000128

AC:

AN:

77876

AF XY:

0.00

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.0000306

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.00000837

AC:

AN:

1314198

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000109

AC XY:

AN XY:

641566

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.0000759

AC:

AN:

26342

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

21754

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

20090

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

32164

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

67084

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

45442

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5242

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.00000864

AC:

AN:

1041952

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

54128

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.511

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

Cov.:

Alfa

AF:

0.00

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.00000378

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign

Submissions summary: Benign:7

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome

Benign:2

Feb 23, 2022

Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jul 24, 2014

Ambry Genetics

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

not specified

Benign:1

Mar 04, 2025

Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Lynch syndrome 5

Benign:1

Dec 17, 2024

Myriad Genetics, Inc.

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered benign. This variant is a silent/synonymous amino acid change and it is not expected to impact splicing. -

Lynch syndrome

Benign:1

Aug 15, 2023

All of Us Research Program, National Institutes of Health

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not provided

Benign:1

Jan 19, 2021

GeneDx

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal neoplasms

Benign:1

Jan 07, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.68

CADD

Benign

(source)

DANN

Benign

0.94

PhyloP100

0.28

PromoterAI

0.093

Neutral

(source)

RBP_binding_hub_radar

0.0

RBP_regulation_power_radar

1.8

Mutation Taster

=100/0

polymorphism

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.14

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over