rs786203116
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. Variant got 5 ACMG points: 5P and 0B. PM1PM2PP3
The NM_000251.3(MSH2):c.1315C>G(p.Pro439Ala) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000137 in 1,461,136 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. P439L) has been classified as Likely benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000251.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Uncertain_significance. Variant got 5 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MSH2 | NM_000251.3 | c.1315C>G | p.Pro439Ala | missense_variant | 8/16 | ENST00000233146.7 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MSH2 | ENST00000233146.7 | c.1315C>G | p.Pro439Ala | missense_variant | 8/16 | 1 | NM_000251.3 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes ? Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00000797 AC: 2AN: 250892Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.00000737 AC XY: 1AN XY: 135706
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000137 AC: 2AN: 1461136Hom.: 0 Cov.: 30 AF XY: 0.00000138 AC XY: 1AN XY: 726926
GnomAD4 genome ? Cov.: 33
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Uncertain:2
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Dec 19, 2022 | The p.P439A variant (also known as c.1315C>G), located in coding exon 8 of the MSH2 gene, results from a C to G substitution at nucleotide position 1315. The proline at codon 439 is replaced by alanine, an amino acid with highly similar properties. In a massively parallel cell-based functional assay testing susceptibility to a DNA damaging agent, 6-thioguanine (6-TG), this variant was reported to be functionally neutral (Jia X et al. Am J Hum Genet, 2021 Jan;108:163-175). This amino acid position is highly conserved on limited sequence alignment. In addition, this alteration is predicted to be deleterious by in silico analysis. Since supporting evidence is limited at this time, the clinical significance of this alteration remains unclear. - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health | Jan 04, 2024 | This missense variant replaces proline with alanine at codon 439 of the MSH2 protein. Computational prediction suggests that this variant may have deleterious impact on protein structure and function (internally defined REVEL score threshold >= 0.7, PMID: 27666373). This variant has intermediate MSH2 function in a 6-thioguanine sensitivity assay in haploid human cells (internally defined LOF score threshold -1.32 < LOF score < 0.88, PMID: 33357406). This variant has not been reported in individuals affected with MSH2-related disorders in the literature. This variant has been identified in 2/250892 chromosomes in the general population by the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD). The available evidence is insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease conclusively. Therefore, this variant is classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. - |
Lynch syndrome Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | All of Us Research Program, National Institutes of Health | Feb 05, 2024 | This missense variant replaces proline with alanine at codon 439 of the MSH2 protein. Computational prediction suggests that this variant may have deleterious impact on protein structure and function (internally defined REVEL score threshold >= 0.7, PMID: 27666373). This variant has intermediate MSH2 function in a 6-thioguanine sensitivity assay in haploid human cells (internally defined LOF score threshold -1.32 < LOF score < 0.88, PMID: 33357406). This variant has not been reported in individuals affected with MSH2-related disorders in the literature. This variant has been identified in 2/250892 chromosomes in the general population by the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD). The available evidence is insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease conclusively. Therefore, this variant is classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. - |
not provided Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Sep 26, 2016 | This variant is denoted MSH2 c.1315C>G at the cDNA level, p.Pro439Ala (P439A) at the protein level, and results in the change of a Proline to an Alanine (CCT>GCT). This variant has not, to our knowledge, been published in the literature as pathogenic or benign. MSH2 Pro439Ala was not observed in approximately 6,500 individuals of European and African American ancestry in the NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project, suggesting it is not a common benign variant in these populations. Since Proline and Alanine differ in some properties, this is considered a semi-conservative amino acid substitution. MSH2 Pro439Ala occurs at a position that is conserved across species and is located in the lever domain, the region of interaction with MSH6, MSH3 and in a region that stabilizes interaction with EXO1 (Lützen 2008). In silico analyses predict that this variant is probably damaging to protein structure and function. Based on currently available evidence, it is unclear whether MSH2 Pro439Ala is a pathogenic or benign variant. We consider it to be a variant of uncertain significance. - |
Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | research | Cancer Genomics Group, Japanese Foundation For Cancer Research | May 01, 2019 | - - |
Hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal neoplasms Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Invitae | Dec 12, 2023 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at