rs78683075
Positions:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -5 ACMG points: 3P and 8B. PM1PP3BS1BS2
The NM_144997.7(FLCN):c.715C>T(p.Arg239Cys) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000438 in 1,614,232 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.00025 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00046 ( 1 hom. )
Consequence
FLCN
NM_144997.7 missense
NM_144997.7 missense
Scores
15
3
1
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 7.11
Genes affected
FLCN (HGNC:27310): (folliculin) This gene is located within the Smith-Magenis syndrome region on chromosome 17. Mutations in this gene are associated with Birt-Hogg-Dube syndrome, which is characterized by fibrofolliculomas, renal tumors, lung cysts, and pneumothorax. Alternative splicing of this gene results in two transcript variants encoding different isoforms. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -5 ACMG points.
PM1
In a domain uDENN FLCN/SMCR8-type (size 156) in uniprot entity FLCN_HUMAN there are 14 pathogenic changes around while only 2 benign (88%) in NM_144997.7
PP3
MetaRNN computational evidence supports a deleterious effect, 0.811
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4_exome allele frequency = 0.000458 (669/1461890) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.000567 (631/1112012). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00053. There are 1 homozygotes in gnomad4_exome. There are 334 alleles in male gnomad4_exome subpopulation. Median coverage is 31. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 38 AD gene.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000250 AC: 38AN: 152224Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
38
AN:
152224
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000259 AC: 65AN: 251378Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000228 AC XY: 31AN XY: 135910
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
65
AN:
251378
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
31
AN XY:
135910
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000458 AC: 669AN: 1461890Hom.: 1 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.000459 AC XY: 334AN XY: 727246
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
669
AN:
1461890
Hom.:
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
AC XY:
334
AN XY:
727246
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000249 AC: 38AN: 152342Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.000242 AC XY: 18AN XY: 74500
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
38
AN:
152342
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
AC XY:
18
AN XY:
74500
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
TwinsUK
AF:
AC:
1
ALSPAC
AF:
AC:
4
ESP6500AA
AF:
AC:
1
ESP6500EA
AF:
AC:
5
ExAC
AF:
AC:
30
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:8Benign:6Other:1
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Uncertain:4Benign:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Institute for Clinical Genetics, University Hospital TU Dresden, University Hospital TU Dresden | Nov 03, 2021 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Mayo Clinic Laboratories, Mayo Clinic | Jun 25, 2024 | PP3 - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | May 13, 2021 | In silico analysis supports that this missense variant has a deleterious effect on protein structure/function; Observed in individuals with FLCN-related tumors and other cancers (Woodward 2008, Whitworth 2016, Melloni 2017); Also known as c.1213C>T; This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 23784378, 26608100, 25637381, 28873162, 20981092, 21538689, 24055113, 19802896, 19562744, 23155228, 26334087, 23217326, 23820649, 26659639, 23414156, 24728327, 28569218, 18794106, 28785590, 29357828, 28970150, 33137092, 33858678) - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Feb 01, 2023 | FLCN: PP3 - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano | Jun 27, 2024 | The FLCN c.715C>T (p.Arg239Cys) variant has been reported in the published literature in individuals with Birt-Hogg-Dube (BHD) syndrome (PMID: 36291753 (2022), 23155228 (2012), 18794106 (2008)), rectal adenocarcinoma (PMID: 26659639 (2016)), and breast cancer (PMID: 32091409 (2020)). This variant has also been identified in reportedly healthy individuals (PMID: 25637381 (2015), 24728327 (2014)). In addition, functional studies in the published literature demonstrate that this variant is damaging to protein stability and reduced protein levels due to proteasomal degradation (PMID: 33137092 (2020) and 21538689 (2011)). The frequency of this variant in the general population, 0.00077 (39/50786 chromosomes in North-Western European subpopulation (Genome Aggregation Database, http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org)), is higher than would generally be expected for pathogenic variants in this gene. Based on the available information, we are unable to determine the clinical significance of this variant. - |
Birt-Hogg-Dube syndrome Uncertain:2Benign:3
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Apr 27, 2017 | This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. The evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was sufficient to determine this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Feb 02, 2025 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genomic Diagnostic Laboratory, Division of Genomic Diagnostics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia | Jul 18, 2016 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | research | CSER _CC_NCGL, University of Washington | Dec 01, 2015 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Mendelics | Aug 22, 2023 | - - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Uncertain:1Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | May 03, 2019 | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | curation | Sema4, Sema4 | Oct 13, 2021 | - - |
not specified Uncertain:1Other:1
not provided, no classification provided | reference population | ITMI | Sep 19, 2013 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital | Jul 31, 2024 | - - |
FLCN-related disorder Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | Jan 08, 2024 | This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Pathogenic
BayesDel_addAF
Pathogenic
D
BayesDel_noAF
Pathogenic
CADD
Pathogenic
DANN
Pathogenic
DEOGEN2
Pathogenic
D;.
Eigen
Pathogenic
Eigen_PC
Pathogenic
FATHMM_MKL
Pathogenic
D
LIST_S2
Uncertain
D;D
M_CAP
Uncertain
D
MetaRNN
Pathogenic
D;D
MetaSVM
Pathogenic
D
MutationAssessor
Uncertain
M;M
PrimateAI
Pathogenic
D
PROVEAN
Pathogenic
D;D
REVEL
Pathogenic
Sift
Pathogenic
D;D
Sift4G
Pathogenic
D;D
Polyphen
D;D
Vest4
MVP
MPC
ClinPred
T
GERP RS
Varity_R
gMVP
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at