rs78891557
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points: 0P and 19B. BP4_ModerateBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2
The NM_002471.4(MYH6):c.399G>A(p.Val133=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00223 in 1,614,140 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 94 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.012 ( 53 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0012 ( 41 hom. )
Consequence
MYH6
NM_002471.4 synonymous
NM_002471.4 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: -0.153
Genes affected
MYH6 (HGNC:7576): (myosin heavy chain 6) Cardiac muscle myosin is a hexamer consisting of two heavy chain subunits, two light chain subunits, and two regulatory subunits. This gene encodes the alpha heavy chain subunit of cardiac myosin. The gene is located approximately 4kb downstream of the gene encoding the beta heavy chain subunit of cardiac myosin. Mutations in this gene cause familial hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and atrial septal defect 3. [provided by RefSeq, Feb 2017]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points.
BP4
?
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.31).
BP6
?
Variant 14-23405326-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr14-23405326-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 44500.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr14-23405326-C-T is described in Lovd as [Benign]. Variant chr14-23405326-C-T is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BP7
?
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.153 with no splicing effect.
BS1
?
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.0124 (1889/152318) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.0431 (1792/41564). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0415. There are 53 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 872 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
?
High AC in GnomAd at 1883 AD gene.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MYH6 | NM_002471.4 | c.399G>A | p.Val133= | synonymous_variant | 5/39 | ENST00000405093.9 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MYH6 | ENST00000405093.9 | c.399G>A | p.Val133= | synonymous_variant | 5/39 | 5 | NM_002471.4 | P1 | |
MYH6 | ENST00000557461.2 | n.466G>A | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 5/14 | 5 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes ? AF: 0.0124 AC: 1883AN: 152200Hom.: 53 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
?
AF:
AC:
1883
AN:
152200
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00321 AC: 807AN: 251472Hom.: 21 AF XY: 0.00232 AC XY: 315AN XY: 135908
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
807
AN:
251472
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
315
AN XY:
135908
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00117 AC: 1708AN: 1461822Hom.: 41 Cov.: 34 AF XY: 0.000956 AC XY: 695AN XY: 727210
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
1708
AN:
1461822
Hom.:
Cov.:
34
AF XY:
AC XY:
695
AN XY:
727210
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome ? AF: 0.0124 AC: 1889AN: 152318Hom.: 53 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0117 AC XY: 872AN XY: 74488
GnomAD4 genome
?
AF:
AC:
1889
AN:
152318
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
872
AN XY:
74488
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
10
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:10
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:5
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Nov 15, 2016 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine | May 22, 2012 | 4.1% (154/3738) Afr Amer chrom (ESP) - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center | - | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center | - | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+ | - | - - |
not provided Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | May 07, 2021 | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen | - | - - |
Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy 14 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Invitae | Jan 31, 2024 | - - |
Cardiomyopathy Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario | Apr 07, 2016 | - - |
Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Aug 04, 2015 | This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
Cadd
Benign
Dann
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at