rs78939657

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points: 0P and 19B. BP4_ModerateBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2

The NM_001035.3(RYR2):​c.11835C>T​(p.Val3945=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00172 in 1,611,930 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 29 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0073 ( 13 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0011 ( 16 hom. )

Consequence

RYR2
NM_001035.3 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:13

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.680
Variant links:
Genes affected
RYR2 (HGNC:10484): (ryanodine receptor 2) This gene encodes a ryanodine receptor found in cardiac muscle sarcoplasmic reticulum. The encoded protein is one of the components of a calcium channel, composed of a tetramer of the ryanodine receptor proteins and a tetramer of FK506 binding protein 1B proteins, that supplies calcium to cardiac muscle. Mutations in this gene are associated with stress-induced polymorphic ventricular tachycardia and arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.21).
BP6
Variant 1-237778725-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr1-237778725-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 43715.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr1-237778725-C-T is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.68 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.0073 (1112/152278) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.0243 (1010/41560). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0231. There are 13 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 498 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 1112 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
RYR2NM_001035.3 linkuse as main transcriptc.11835C>T p.Val3945= synonymous_variant 88/105 ENST00000366574.7

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
RYR2ENST00000366574.7 linkuse as main transcriptc.11835C>T p.Val3945= synonymous_variant 88/1051 NM_001035.3 P1Q92736-1
RYR2ENST00000660292.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.11856C>T p.Val3952= synonymous_variant 89/106
RYR2ENST00000659194.3 linkuse as main transcriptc.11823C>T p.Val3941= synonymous_variant 88/105
RYR2ENST00000609119.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.*2927C>T 3_prime_UTR_variant, NMD_transcript_variant 87/1045

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00733
AC:
1115
AN:
152160
Hom.:
13
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0244
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00367
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00424
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000162
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00621
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.00207
AC:
515
AN:
248692
Hom.:
7
AF XY:
0.00149
AC XY:
201
AN XY:
134916
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0258
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00160
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00189
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.0000981
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000151
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00116
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00114
AC:
1662
AN:
1459652
Hom.:
16
Cov.:
28
AF XY:
0.00103
AC XY:
749
AN XY:
726220
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.0244
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00172
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.0147
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0000697
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.0000504
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00184
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00730
AC:
1112
AN:
152278
Hom.:
13
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.00669
AC XY:
498
AN XY:
74462
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.0243
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00366
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00425
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.000162
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00615
Alfa
AF:
0.00264
Hom.:
1
Bravo
AF:
0.00832
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00462
AC:
16
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.000164
EpiControl
AF:
0.000119

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:13
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:5
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLaboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized MedicineNov 19, 2012Val3945Val in exon 88 of RYR2: This variant is not expected to have clinical sig nificance because it does not alter an amino acid residue and has been identifie d in 2.7% (104/3836) of African American chromosomes from a broad population by the NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project (http://evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS/; dbSNP rs7 8939657). -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingGenome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxApr 15, 2014This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center-- -
Cardiomyopathy Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern OntarioDec 02, 2015- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingColor Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color HealthMar 16, 2018- -
Catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia 1 Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 12, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeJan 31, 2024- -
Catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAll of Us Research Program, National Institutes of HealthFeb 05, 2024- -
not provided Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP LaboratoriesNov 29, 2023- -
Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsMar 23, 2015This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia 2 Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 12, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.21
CADD
Benign
5.8
DANN
Benign
0.68

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs78939657; hg19: chr1-237942025; API