rs78939657

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points: 0P and 19B. BP4_ModerateBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2

The NM_001035.3(RYR2):c.11835C>T(p.Val3945Val) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00172 in 1,611,930 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 29 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0073 ( 13 hom., cov: 33)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.0011 ( 16 hom. )

Consequence

RYR2
NM_001035.3 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:14

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.680

Variant links:

Genes affected

RYR2 (HGNC:10484): (ryanodine receptor 2) This gene encodes a ryanodine receptor found in cardiac muscle sarcoplasmic reticulum. The encoded protein is one of the components of a calcium channel, composed of a tetramer of the ryanodine receptor proteins and a tetramer of FK506 binding protein 1B proteins, that supplies calcium to cardiac muscle. Mutations in this gene are associated with stress-induced polymorphic ventricular tachycardia and arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

RYR2 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.21).

BP6

Variant 1-237778725-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr1-237778725-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 43715.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr1-237778725-C-T is described in Lovd as [Benign].

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.68 with no splicing effect.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.0073 (1112/152278) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.0243 (1010/41560). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0231. There are 13 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 498 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position pass quality control queck.

BS2

High AC in GnomAd4 at 1112 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
RYR2	NM_001035.3 link	c.11835C>T	p.Val3945Val	synonymous_variant	Exon 88 of 105	ENST00000366574.7	NP_001026.2	Q92736-1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	UniProt
RYR2	ENST00000366574.7 link	c.11835C>T	p.Val3945Val	synonymous_variant	Exon 88 of 105	1	NM_001035.3	ENSP00000355533.2	Q92736-1
RYR2	ENST00000609119.2 link	n.*2927C>T		non_coding_transcript_exon_variant	Exon 87 of 104	5		ENSP00000499659.2	A0A590UK06
RYR2	ENST00000609119.2 link	n.*2927C>T		3_prime_UTR_variant	Exon 87 of 104	5		ENSP00000499659.2	A0A590UK06

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.00733

AC:

1115

AN:

152160

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0244

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00367

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00424

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.000162

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00621

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.00207

AC:

515

AN:

248692

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.00149

AC XY:

201

AN XY:

134916

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.0258

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00160

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00189

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.0000981

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.000151

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00116

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.00114

AC:

1662

AN:

1459652

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00103

AC XY:

749

AN XY:

726220

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.0244

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.00172

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.0147

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.0000697

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.0000504

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.00184

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.00730

AC:

1112

AN:

152278

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00669

AC XY:

498

AN XY:

74462

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.0243

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.00366

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00425

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.000162

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00615

Alfa

AF:

0.00264

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.00832

Asia WGS

AF:

0.00462

AC:

AN:

3478

EpiCase

AF:

0.000164

EpiControl

AF:

0.000119

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign

Submissions summary: Benign:14

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified

Benign:5

Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Nov 19, 2012

Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

Val3945Val in exon 88 of RYR2: This variant is not expected to have clinical sig nificance because it does not alter an amino acid residue and has been identifie d in 2.7% (104/3836) of African American chromosomes from a broad population by the NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project (http://evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS/; dbSNP rs7 8939657). -

Apr 15, 2014

GeneDx

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Cardiomyopathy

Benign:2

Dec 02, 2015

CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Mar 16, 2018

Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

not provided

Benign:2

Nov 29, 2023

ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: not provided

- -

Catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia 1

Benign:2

Feb 02, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jan 12, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia

Benign:1

Feb 05, 2024

All of Us Research Program, National Institutes of Health

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Cardiovascular phenotype

Benign:1

Mar 23, 2015

Ambry Genetics

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia 2

Benign:1

Jan 12, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.21

CADD

Benign

5.8

DANN

Benign

0.68

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over