rs79036642

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Uncertain significance. Variant got 0 ACMG points: 4P and 4B. PM1PM2BP4_Strong

The NM_001142800.2(EYS):c.8860T>C(p.Phe2954Leu) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000599 in 1,551,640 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 12/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00011 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.000054 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

EYS
NM_001142800.2 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:3B:2

Conservation

PhyloP100: 1.07

Variant links:

Genes affected

EYS (HGNC:21555): (eyes shut homolog) The product of this gene contains multiple epidermal growth factor (EGF)-like and LamG domains. The protein is expressed in the photoreceptor layer of the retina, and the gene is mutated in autosomal recessive retinitis pigmentosa. Multiple transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Dec 2008]

EYS links:

PHF3 (HGNC:8921): (PHD finger protein 3) This gene encodes a member of a PHD finger-containing gene family. This gene may function as a transcription factor and may be involved in glioblastomas development. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, Mar 2014]

PHF3 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Uncertain_significance. Variant got 0 ACMG points.

PM1

In a domain EGF-like 27 (size 37) in uniprot entity EYS_HUMAN there are 7 pathogenic changes around while only 1 benign (88%) in NM_001142800.2

PM2

Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage;

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.025678992).

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
EYS	NM_001142800.2 link	c.8860T>C	p.Phe2954Leu	missense_variant	Exon 43 of 43	ENST00000503581.6	NP_001136272.1	Q5T1H1-1
PHF3	NM_001370348.2 link	c.*7463A>G		3_prime_UTR_variant	Exon 16 of 16	ENST00000262043.8	NP_001357277.1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	UniProt
EYS	ENST00000503581.6 link	c.8860T>C	p.Phe2954Leu	missense_variant	Exon 43 of 43	5	NM_001142800.2	ENSP00000424243.1	Q5T1H1-1
EYS	ENST00000370621.7 link	c.8923T>C	p.Phe2975Leu	missense_variant	Exon 44 of 44	1		ENSP00000359655.3	Q5T1H1-3
PHF3	ENST00000262043.8 link	c.*7463A>G		3_prime_UTR_variant	Exon 16 of 16	5	NM_001370348.2	ENSP00000262043.4	Q92576-1
PHF3	ENST00000505138.1 link	c.361+9809A>G		intron_variant	Intron 3 of 4	3		ENSP00000421417.1	H0Y8L0

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.000112

AC:

AN:

152182

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00327

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.00

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.000237

AC:

AN:

156170

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.000315

AC XY:

AN XY:

82616

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00339

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.0000543

AC:

AN:

1399340

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000609

AC XY:

AN XY:

690174

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00204

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

9.27e-7

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.0000345

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.000112

AC:

AN:

152300

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000121

AC XY:

AN XY:

74480

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00328

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00

Alfa

AF:

0.0000712

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.000162

Asia WGS

AF:

0.000289

AC:

AN:

3478

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:3Benign:2

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Retinitis pigmentosa 25

Uncertain:1

Jun 05, 2017

Counsyl

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Retinal dystrophy

Uncertain:1

Oct 01, 2023

Dept Of Ophthalmology, Nagoya University

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: research

- -

Retinitis pigmentosa

Uncertain:1

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

not specified

Benign:1

Jun 02, 2022

Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

Variant summary: EYS c.8860T>C (p.Phe2954Leu) results in a non-conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Three of five in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00023 in 187570 control chromosomes, predominantly at a frequency of 0.0035 within the East Asian subpopulation in the gnomAD database. The observed variant frequency within East Asian control individuals in the gnomAD database is approximately 1.02 fold of the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in EYS causing Retinitis Pigmentosa phenotype (0.0035 vs 0.0034), strongly suggesting that the variant is a benign polymorphism found primarily in populations of East Asian origin. c.8860T>C has been reported in the literature in individuals affected with Retinitis Pigmentosa (Ge_2015, Numa_2020). These reports do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Retinitis Pigmentosa. To our knowledge, no experimental evidence demonstrating an impact on protein function has been reported. Three ClinVar submitters (evaluation after 2014) cite the variant as uncertain significance (n=2) and likely benign (n=1). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as likely benign. -

not provided

Benign:1

Dec 13, 2024

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Pathogenic

0.90

BayesDel_addAF

Benign

-0.28

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.17

CADD

Benign

DANN

Uncertain

0.99

DEOGEN2

Benign

0.034

.;T

Eigen

Benign

-0.051

Eigen_PC

Benign

0.052

FATHMM_MKL

Uncertain

0.83

LIST_S2

Benign

0.45

T;T

M_CAP

Uncertain

0.087

MetaRNN

Benign

0.026

T;T

MetaSVM

Benign

-0.72

MutationAssessor

Benign

1.4

.;L

PrimateAI

Benign

0.46

PROVEAN

Benign

-1.4

N;N

REVEL

Uncertain

0.29

Sift

Uncertain

0.019

D;D

Sift4G

Uncertain

0.040

D;D

Polyphen

0.69

P;B

Vest4

0.58

MutPred

0.43

.;Gain of ubiquitination at K2979 (P = 0.115);

MVP

0.47

MPC

0.045

ClinPred

0.20

GERP RS

4.5

Varity_R

0.38

gMVP

0.80

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over