rs79079368

Variant names:

Your query was ambiguous. Multiple possible variants found:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_006208.3(ENPP1):c.1831C>G(p.Leu611Val) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00417 in 1,614,056 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 150 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.015 ( 59 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.0031 ( 91 hom. )

Consequence

ENPP1
NM_006208.3 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications P:1B:7O:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.177

Variant links:

Genes affected

ENPP1 (HGNC:3356): (ectonucleotide pyrophosphatase/phosphodiesterase 1) This gene is a member of the ecto-nucleotide pyrophosphatase/phosphodiesterase (ENPP) family. The encoded protein is a type II transmembrane glycoprotein comprising two identical disulfide-bonded subunits. This protein has broad specificity and cleaves a variety of substrates, including phosphodiester bonds of nucleotides and nucleotide sugars and pyrophosphate bonds of nucleotides and nucleotide sugars. This protein may function to hydrolyze nucleoside 5' triphosphates to their corresponding monophosphates and may also hydrolyze diadenosine polyphosphates. Mutations in this gene have been associated with 'idiopathic' infantile arterial calcification, ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament of the spine (OPLL), and insulin resistance. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

ENPP1 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.0034568608).

BP6

Variant 6-131877099-C-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr6-131877099-C-G is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 161093.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.0148 (2252/152294) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.0481 (2000/41550). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0464. There are 59 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 1104 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.

BS2

High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 59 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
ENPP1	NM_006208.3 link	c.1831C>G	p.Leu611Val	missense_variant	Exon 18 of 25	ENST00000647893.1	NP_006199.2	P22413

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
ENPP1	ENST00000647893.1 link	c.1831C>G	p.Leu611Val	missense_variant	Exon 18 of 25		NM_006208.3	ENSP00000498074.1		P22413

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.0148

AC:

2246

AN:

152176

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0481

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00412

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.0321

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.000206

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00958

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.00656

AC:

1648

AN:

251036

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.00674

AC XY:

915

AN XY:

135704

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.0484

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00165

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.000109

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.0257

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.0000616

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00180

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.00306

AC:

4479

AN:

1461762

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00360

AC XY:

2618

AN XY:

727180

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.0506

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.00210

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.0000756

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.0264

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.000138

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.00404

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.0148

AC:

2252

AN:

152294

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0148

AC XY:

1104

AN XY:

74488

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.0481

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.00412

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.0321

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.000206

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00948

Alfa

AF:

0.000782

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.0149

TwinsUK

AF:

0.00

AC:

ALSPAC

AF:

0.000259

AC:

ESP6500AA

AF:

0.0422

AC:

186

ESP6500EA

AF:

0.000233

AC:

ExAC

AF:

0.00792

AC:

961

Asia WGS

AF:

0.00982

AC:

AN:

3478

EpiCase

AF:

0.000218

EpiControl

AF:

0.000237

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Pathogenic:1Benign:7Other:1

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided

Benign:3

Apr 01, 2024

CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

ENPP1: BP4, BS1, BS2 -

Apr 16, 2019

GeneDx

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 27884173, 12881724, 21228398, 20981092, 22995991) -

Jan 30, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

not specified

Benign:2

Mar 20, 2024

Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

The p.Leu611Val variant in ENPP1 is classified as likely benign because it has been identified in 4.9% (3694/75028) of African chromosomes, including 150 total homozygotes by gnomAD (http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org, v.4.0.0). In addition, computational prediction tools predict that this variant does not impact the protein. ACMG/AMP Criteria applied: BS1, BP4. -

Jun 28, 2018

Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Arterial calcification, generalized, of infancy, 1

Benign:1Other:1

GeneReviews

Significance: not provided

Review Status: no classification provided

Collection Method: literature only

- -

Apr 27, 2017

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. The evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was sufficient to determine this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. -

Hypophosphatemic rickets

Pathogenic:1

Mar 07, 2022

Laboratory of Cyto-molecular Genetics, Department of Anatomy, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), New Delhi

Significance: Likely pathogenic

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Hypophosphatemic rickets, autosomal recessive, 2

Benign:1

Apr 27, 2017

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases allowed determination this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Benign

0.070

BayesDel_addAF

Benign

-0.54

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.51

CADD

Benign

0.068

DANN

Benign

0.23

DEOGEN2

Benign

0.32

T;T

Eigen

Benign

-1.3

Eigen_PC

Benign

-1.3

FATHMM_MKL

Benign

0.15

LIST_S2

Benign

0.55

.;T

MetaRNN

Benign

0.0035

T;T

MetaSVM

Benign

-1.0

MutationAssessor

Benign

1.4

L;L

PrimateAI

Benign

0.20

PROVEAN

Benign

0.080

N;.

REVEL

Benign

0.046

Sift

Benign

0.59

T;.

Sift4G

Benign

0.62

T;.

Polyphen

0.0010

B;B

Vest4

0.17

MVP

0.28

MPC

0.21

ClinPred

0.000027

GERP RS

-0.63

RBP_binding_hub_radar

0.0

RBP_regulation_power_radar

1.1

Varity_R

0.020

gMVP

0.41

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over