Menu
GeneBe

rs7908490

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1

The NM_001134363.3(RBM20):c.517C>A(p.Pro173Thr) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00424 in 1,551,686 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 236 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/17 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. P173S) has been classified as Uncertain significance.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.022 ( 124 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0023 ( 112 hom. )

Consequence

RBM20
NM_001134363.3 missense

Scores

1
14

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:13

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.265
Variant links:
Genes affected
RBM20 (HGNC:27424): (RNA binding motif protein 20) This gene encodes a protein that binds RNA and regulates splicing. Mutations in this gene have been associated with familial dilated cardiomyopathy. [provided by RefSeq, Apr 2014]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.001773119).
BP6
Variant 10-110781126-C-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr10-110781126-C-A is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 44020.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr10-110781126-C-A is described in Lovd as [Benign]. Variant chr10-110781126-C-A is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AFR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.0751 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
RBM20NM_001134363.3 linkuse as main transcriptc.517C>A p.Pro173Thr missense_variant 2/14 ENST00000369519.4
RBM20XM_017016103.3 linkuse as main transcriptc.352C>A p.Pro118Thr missense_variant 2/14
RBM20XM_017016104.3 linkuse as main transcriptc.133C>A p.Pro45Thr missense_variant 2/14
RBM20XM_047425116.1 linkuse as main transcriptc.133C>A p.Pro45Thr missense_variant 2/14

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
RBM20ENST00000369519.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.517C>A p.Pro173Thr missense_variant 2/141 NM_001134363.3 P1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0223
AC:
3399
AN:
152118
Hom.:
124
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0775
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00942
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00316
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000294
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.0124
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.00504
AC:
789
AN:
156518
Hom.:
24
AF XY:
0.00379
AC XY:
314
AN XY:
82938
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0800
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00470
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.000176
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000264
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00385
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00227
AC:
3179
AN:
1399450
Hom.:
112
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00195
AC XY:
1345
AN XY:
690236
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.0775
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00538
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.000215
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.0000406
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.000174
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00538
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0224
AC:
3403
AN:
152236
Hom.:
124
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0210
AC XY:
1566
AN XY:
74428
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.0774
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00941
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.000294
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.0123
Alfa
AF:
0.00413
Hom.:
26
Bravo
AF:
0.0257
TwinsUK
AF:
0.000270
AC:
1
ALSPAC
AF:
0.000259
AC:
1
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.0708
AC:
98
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
ExAC
AF:
0.00648
AC:
177
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00289
AC:
10
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:13
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:7
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingJoint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLaboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized MedicineJul 03, 20127.1% (98/1384) of Afr Amer chrom from ESP -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxApr 30, 2013This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingWomen's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorpSep 03, 2019Variant summary: RBM20 c.517C>A (p.Pro173Thr) results in a non-conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Four of five in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.005 in 156518 control chromosomes in the gnomAD database, including 24 homozygotes. The observed variant frequency is approximately 202 fold of the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in RBM20 causing Cardiomyopathy phenotype (2.5e-05), strongly suggesting that the variant is benign. To our knowledge, no occurrence of c.517C>A in individuals affected with Cardiomyopathy and no experimental evidence demonstrating its impact on protein function have been reported. Four clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 without evidence for independent evaluation. All laboratories classified the variant as benign/likely benign. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as benign. -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center-- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingGenome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht-- -
Dilated cardiomyopathy 1DD Benign:4
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeJan 31, 2024- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaApr 27, 2017This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases allowed determination this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingDiagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP LaboratoriesOct 16, 2023- -
Cardiomyopathy Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern OntarioApr 11, 2016- -
Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsJul 21, 2015This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.066
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.52
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.45
Cadd
Benign
12
Dann
Uncertain
0.99
Eigen
Benign
-0.72
Eigen_PC
Benign
-0.68
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.21
N
MetaRNN
Benign
0.0018
T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.94
T
MutationTaster
Benign
1.0
N
PrimateAI
Benign
0.39
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-0.99
N
REVEL
Benign
0.15
Sift
Benign
0.13
T
Sift4G
Benign
0.65
T
Vest4
0.071
MVP
0.25
ClinPred
0.0045
T
GERP RS
1.5
gMVP
0.25

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs7908490; hg19: chr10-112540884; API