rs790897
Positions:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2
The NM_001035.3(RYR2):c.14809-15C>G variant causes a splice polypyrimidine tract, intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00803 in 1,562,306 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 71 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.0054 ( 1 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0083 ( 70 hom. )
Consequence
RYR2
NM_001035.3 splice_polypyrimidine_tract, intron
NM_001035.3 splice_polypyrimidine_tract, intron
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: -0.131
Genes affected
RYR2 (HGNC:10484): (ryanodine receptor 2) This gene encodes a ryanodine receptor found in cardiac muscle sarcoplasmic reticulum. The encoded protein is one of the components of a calcium channel, composed of a tetramer of the ryanodine receptor proteins and a tetramer of FK506 binding protein 1B proteins, that supplies calcium to cardiac muscle. Mutations in this gene are associated with stress-induced polymorphic ventricular tachycardia and arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
BP4
?
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.78).
BP6
?
Variant 1-237832537-C-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr1-237832537-C-G is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 36735.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr1-237832537-C-G is described in Lovd as [Benign]. Variant chr1-237832537-C-G is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BS1
?
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00544 (828/152278) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.00967 (658/68034). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00906. There are 1 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 358 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
?
High AC in GnomAd4 at 828 AD gene.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RYR2 | NM_001035.3 | c.14809-15C>G | splice_polypyrimidine_tract_variant, intron_variant | ENST00000366574.7 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RYR2 | ENST00000366574.7 | c.14809-15C>G | splice_polypyrimidine_tract_variant, intron_variant | 1 | NM_001035.3 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes ? AF: 0.00545 AC: 830AN: 152160Hom.: 1 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
?
AF:
AC:
830
AN:
152160
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00547 AC: 1326AN: 242316Hom.: 6 AF XY: 0.00555 AC XY: 730AN XY: 131640
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
1326
AN:
242316
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
730
AN XY:
131640
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00831 AC: 11714AN: 1410028Hom.: 70 Cov.: 23 AF XY: 0.00820 AC XY: 5778AN XY: 704670
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
11714
AN:
1410028
Hom.:
Cov.:
23
AF XY:
AC XY:
5778
AN XY:
704670
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome ? AF: 0.00544 AC: 828AN: 152278Hom.: 1 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00481 AC XY: 358AN XY: 74456
GnomAD4 genome
?
AF:
AC:
828
AN:
152278
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
358
AN XY:
74456
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
7
AN:
3478
ClinVar
Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:17
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:6
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Jul 01, 2023 | RYR2: BS1, BS2 - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Center for Pediatric Genomic Medicine, Children's Mercy Hospital and Clinics | Jun 16, 2017 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Mar 03, 2015 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Oct 02, 2023 | - - |
not specified Benign:5
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine | Feb 29, 2012 | 14809-15C>G in intron 104 of RYR2: This variant is not expected to have clinical significance because it has been identified in 1.1% (70/6652) of European Ameri can chromosomes from a broad population by the NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project (h ttp://evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS; dbSNP rs790897). - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+ | - | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center | - | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | - | - - |
Cardiomyopathy Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health | Mar 15, 2018 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | May 13, 2015 | - - |
Catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia 1 Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Invitae | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
Catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | All of Us Research Program, National Institutes of Health | Feb 05, 2024 | - - |
Arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia 2 Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at