rs79229040
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2
The NM_001943.5(DSG2):c.2886T>G(p.Ile962Met) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000478 in 1,603,574 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 4 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. I962T) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001943.5 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_001943.5. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DSG2 | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.2886T>G | p.Ile962Met | missense | Exon 15 of 15 | ENSP00000261590.8 | Q14126 | ||
| DSG2 | c.2877T>G | p.Ile959Met | missense | Exon 16 of 16 | ENSP00000519121.1 | A0AAQ5BGZ7 | |||
| DSG2 | c.2877T>G | p.Ile959Met | missense | Exon 17 of 17 | ENSP00000519123.1 | A0AAQ5BGZ7 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00262 AC: 399AN: 152162Hom.: 1 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.000601 AC: 145AN: 241300 AF XY: 0.000482 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000246 AC: 357AN: 1451294Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000201 AC XY: 145AN XY: 720702 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00269 AC: 410AN: 152280Hom.: 4 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00298 AC XY: 222AN XY: 74454 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at