rs79254654
Positions:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2
The NM_001195248.2(APTX):c.318C>T(p.Asn106Asn) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00141 in 1,614,130 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 25 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.0077 ( 12 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00075 ( 13 hom. )
Consequence
APTX
NM_001195248.2 synonymous
NM_001195248.2 synonymous
Scores
1
1
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: -0.301
Genes affected
APTX (HGNC:15984): (aprataxin) This gene encodes a member of the histidine triad (HIT) superfamily. The encoded protein may play a role in single-stranded DNA repair through its nucleotide-binding activity and its diadenosine polyphosphate hydrolase activity. Mutations in this gene have been associated with ataxia-ocular apraxia. Alternatively spliced transcript variants have been identified for this gene.[provided by RefSeq, Aug 2010]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.73).
BP6
Variant 9-32987709-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr9-32987709-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 136413.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr9-32987709-G-A is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign]. Variant chr9-32987709-G-A is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.301 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00767 (1167/152240) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.0269 (1116/41518). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0256. There are 12 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 541 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 12 AR gene
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
APTX | NM_001195248.2 | c.318C>T | p.Asn106Asn | synonymous_variant | 4/8 | ENST00000379817.7 | NP_001182177.2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
APTX | ENST00000379817.7 | c.318C>T | p.Asn106Asn | synonymous_variant | 4/8 | 1 | NM_001195248.2 | ENSP00000369145.2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00766 AC: 1165AN: 152122Hom.: 12 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
1165
AN:
152122
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00204 AC: 512AN: 251364Hom.: 4 AF XY: 0.00149 AC XY: 202AN XY: 135844
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
512
AN:
251364
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
202
AN XY:
135844
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000754 AC: 1102AN: 1461890Hom.: 13 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.000688 AC XY: 500AN XY: 727246
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
1102
AN:
1461890
Hom.:
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
AC XY:
500
AN XY:
727246
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00767 AC: 1167AN: 152240Hom.: 12 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00727 AC XY: 541AN XY: 74434
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
1167
AN:
152240
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
541
AN XY:
74434
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
5
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:8
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:5
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Athena Diagnostics | Oct 11, 2017 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 15, 2024 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Mayo Clinic Laboratories, Mayo Clinic | Aug 22, 2017 | - - |
not specified Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Apr 22, 2014 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center | - | - - |
Ataxia, early-onset, with oculomotor apraxia and hypoalbuminemia Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Uncertain
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at