rs79286201

Variant names:

• chr19-49202092-C-T
• rs79286201
• NM_017636.4:c.3082C>T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points: 0P and 19B. BP4_Moderate BP6_Very_Strong BP7 BS1 BS2

The NM_017636.4(TRPM4):​c.3082C>T​(p.Leu1028Leu) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00188 in 1,614,088 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 58 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

• Frequency:
  • Genomes: 𝑓 0.010 (32 hom., cov: 32)
  • Exomes 𝑓: 0.0010 (26 hom.)
• Consequence: TRPM4 NM_017636.4 synonymous
• Clinical Significance: Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:9
• Conservation: PhyloP100: 2.57

Genes affected

TRPM4 (HGNC:17993): (transient receptor potential cation channel subfamily M member 4) The protein encoded by this gene is a calcium-activated nonselective ion channel that mediates transport of monovalent cations across membranes, thereby depolarizing the membrane. The activity of the encoded protein increases with increasing intracellular calcium concentration, but this channel does not transport calcium. [provided by RefSeq, Mar 2016]

ACMG classification

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points.

• BP4: Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.25).
• BP6: Variant 19-49202092-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr19-49202092-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 329872.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr19-49202092-C-T is described in Lovd as [Benign]. Variant chr19-49202092-C-T is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
• BP7: Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=2.57 with no splicing effect.
• BS1: Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.0104 (1580/152266) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.0348 (1448/41560). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0333. There are 32 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 753 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
• BS2: High AC in GnomAd4 at 1580 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
TRPM4	NM_017636.4	c.3082C>T	p.Leu1028Leu	synonymous_variant	Exon 20 of 25	ENST00000252826.10	NP_060106.2

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
TRPM4	ENST00000252826.10	c.3082C>T	p.Leu1028Leu	synonymous_variant	Exon 20 of 25	1	NM_017636.4	ENSP00000252826.4

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0104 AC: 1577 AN: 152148 Hom.: 32 Cov.: 32

Gnomad AFR AF: 0.0349

Gnomad AMI AF: 0.00

Gnomad AMR AF: 0.00642

Gnomad ASJ AF: 0.00

Gnomad EAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad SAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad FIN AF: 0.00

Gnomad MID AF: 0.00

Gnomad NFE AF: 0.000132

Gnomad OTH AF: 0.0120

GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00270 AC: 678 AN: 251404 Hom.: 14 AF XY: 0.00205 AC XY: 278 AN XY: 135884

Gnomad AFR exome AF: 0.0344

Gnomad AMR exome AF: 0.00260

Gnomad ASJ exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad EAS exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad SAS exome AF: 0.0000653

Gnomad FIN exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad NFE exome AF: 0.000141

Gnomad OTH exome AF: 0.00179

GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00100 AC: 1462 AN: 1461822 Hom.: 26 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000826 AC XY: 601 AN XY: 727212

Gnomad4 AFR exome AF: 0.0340

Gnomad4 AMR exome AF: 0.00282

Gnomad4 ASJ exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome AF: 0.0000696

Gnomad4 FIN exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome AF: 0.0000504

Gnomad4 OTH exome AF: 0.00209

GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0104 AC: 1580 AN: 152266 Hom.: 32 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0101 AC XY: 753 AN XY: 74440

Gnomad4 AFR AF: 0.0348

Gnomad4 AMR AF: 0.00641

Gnomad4 ASJ AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 EAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 SAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 FIN AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 NFE AF: 0.000132

Gnomad4 OTH AF: 0.0118

Alfa AF: 0.00455 Hom.: 5

Bravo AF: 0.0122

Asia WGS AF: 0.000866 AC: 3 AN: 3478

EpiCase AF: 0.000164

EpiControl AF: 0.0000593

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign

Submissions summary: Benign:9

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:3

-

Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Oct 14, 2016

GeneDx

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Jan 08, 2024

Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

not provided Benign:3

-

Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: not provided

- -

Sep 13, 2023

ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

-

Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Progressive familial heart block type IB Benign:2

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

Feb 02, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1

Dec 02, 2016

Ambry Genetics

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name	Calibrated prediction	Score	Prediction
BayesDel_noAF	Benign	-0.25
CADD	Benign	7.7
DANN	Benign	0.78

Splicing

Name	Calibrated prediction	Score	Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)		0.0		Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs79286201; hg19: chr19-49705349;