rs79286201

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -19 ACMG points: 0P and 19B. BP4_ModerateBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2

The NM_017636.4(TRPM4):c.3082C>T(p.Leu1028Leu) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00188 in 1,614,088 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 58 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.010 ( 32 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.0010 ( 26 hom. )

Consequence

TRPM4
NM_017636.4 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:10

Conservation

PhyloP100: 2.57

Publications

1 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

TRPM4 (HGNC:17993): (transient receptor potential cation channel subfamily M member 4) The protein encoded by this gene is a calcium-activated nonselective ion channel that mediates transport of monovalent cations across membranes, thereby depolarizing the membrane. The activity of the encoded protein increases with increasing intracellular calcium concentration, but this channel does not transport calcium. [provided by RefSeq, Mar 2016]

TRPM4 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

erythrokeratodermia variabilis et progressiva 6
Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG, MODERATE, LIMITED Submitted by: G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Ambry Genetics
progressive familial heart block type IB
Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG, MODERATE Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Laboratory for Molecular Medicine
erythrokeratodermia variabilis
Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
progressive familial heart block
Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Brugada syndrome
Inheritance: AD Classification: LIMITED, NO_KNOWN Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp, ClinGen

TRPM4 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -19 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.25).

BP6

Variant 19-49202092-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr19-49202092-C-T is described in ClinVar as Benign/Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 329872.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=2.57 with no splicing effect.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.0104 (1580/152266) while in subpopulation AFR AF = 0.0348 (1448/41560). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0333. There are 32 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 753 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position passed quality control check.

BS2

High AC in GnomAd4 at 1580 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
TRPM4	NM_017636.4 link	c.3082C>T	p.Leu1028Leu	synonymous_variant	Exon 20 of 25	ENST00000252826.10	NP_060106.2	Q8TD43-1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
TRPM4	ENST00000252826.10 link	c.3082C>T	p.Leu1028Leu	synonymous_variant	Exon 20 of 25	1	NM_017636.4	ENSP00000252826.4		Q8TD43-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.0104

AC:

1577

AN:

152148

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0349

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00642

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.000132

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.0120

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.00270

AC:

678

AN:

251404

AF XY:

0.00205

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.0344

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00260

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.000141

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00179

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.00100

AC:

1462

AN:

1461822

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000826

AC XY:

601

AN XY:

727212

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.0340

AC:

1138

AN:

33480

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00282

AC:

126

AN:

44724

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

26136

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

39700

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.0000696

AC:

AN:

86258

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

53352

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00173

AC:

AN:

5768

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.0000504

AC:

AN:

1112010

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00209

AC:

126

AN:

60394

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.472

Heterozygous variant carriers

187

280

374

467

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Exome Hom

Variant carriers

114

152

190

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.0104

AC:

1580

AN:

152266

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0101

AC XY:

753

AN XY:

74440

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.0348

AC:

1448

AN:

41560

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00641

AC:

AN:

15290

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3470

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5170

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

4820

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10622

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

294

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.000132

AC:

AN:

68016

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.0118

AC:

AN:

2112

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.496

Heterozygous variant carriers

155

232

310

387

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Genome Hom

Variant carriers

100

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.00455

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.0122

Asia WGS

AF:

0.000866

AC:

AN:

3478

EpiCase

AF:

0.000164

EpiControl

AF:

0.0000593

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign

Submissions summary: Benign:10

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified

Benign:4

Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center

Significance:Benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Oct 14, 2016

GeneDx

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Jan 08, 2024

Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Apr 09, 2025

Molecular Diagnostic Laboratory for Inherited Cardiovascular Disease, Montreal Heart Institute

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not provided

Benign:3

Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:not provided

- -

Sep 13, 2023

ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Progressive familial heart block type IB

Benign:2

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

Feb 02, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Cardiovascular phenotype

Benign:1

Dec 02, 2016

Ambry Genetics

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.25

CADD

Benign

7.7

(source)

DANN

Benign

0.78

PhyloP100

2.6

Mutation Taster

=100/0

polymorphism

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over