rs79386936
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2
The NM_181426.2(CCDC39):āc.2278A>Gā(p.Thr760Ala) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00176 in 1,412,530 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 53 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/19 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (ā ā ).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_181426.2 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CCDC39 | NM_181426.2 | c.2278A>G | p.Thr760Ala | missense_variant | 17/20 | ENST00000476379.6 | NP_852091.1 | |
TTC14 | NM_001288582.2 | c.1775-426T>C | intron_variant | NP_001275511.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CCDC39 | ENST00000476379.6 | c.2278A>G | p.Thr760Ala | missense_variant | 17/20 | 2 | NM_181426.2 | ENSP00000417960 | P2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00943 AC: 1436AN: 152226Hom.: 27 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00270 AC: 456AN: 168884Hom.: 6 AF XY: 0.00222 AC XY: 203AN XY: 91270
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000836 AC: 1054AN: 1260186Hom.: 26 Cov.: 21 AF XY: 0.000771 AC XY: 484AN XY: 627734
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00943 AC: 1437AN: 152344Hom.: 27 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00895 AC XY: 667AN XY: 74500
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine | Feb 21, 2013 | Thr760Ala in exon 17 of CCDC39: This variant is not expected to have clinical si gnificance because it has been identified in 3.4% (123/3574) of African American chromosomes from a broad population by the NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project (http ://evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS; dbSNP rs79386936). - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | - | - - |
Primary ciliary dyskinesia Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 31, 2024 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Jul 08, 2016 | This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
not provided Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Sep 13, 2022 | - - |
Primary ciliary dyskinesia 14 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at