Menu
GeneBe

rs79399438

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1

The NM_001042702.5(PJVK):c.874G>A(p.Gly292Arg) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0261 in 1,613,996 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 897 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.027 ( 86 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.026 ( 811 hom. )

Consequence

PJVK
NM_001042702.5 missense

Scores

5
6

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:8

Conservation

PhyloP100: 5.52
Variant links:
Genes affected
PJVK (HGNC:29502): (pejvakin) The protein encoded by this gene is a member of the gasdermin family, a family which is found only in vertebrates. The encoded protein is required for the proper function of auditory pathway neurons. Defects in this gene are a cause of non-syndromic sensorineural deafness autosomal recessive type 59 (DFNB59). [provided by RefSeq, Dec 2008]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.0017353296).
BP6
Variant 2-178461089-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr2-178461089-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 43873.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr2-178461089-G-A is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (EAS) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.125 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
PJVKNM_001042702.5 linkuse as main transcriptc.874G>A p.Gly292Arg missense_variant 7/7 ENST00000644580.2

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
PJVKENST00000644580.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.874G>A p.Gly292Arg missense_variant 7/7 NM_001042702.5 P1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0271
AC:
4127
AN:
152054
Hom.:
87
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0294
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.0307
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0196
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.0245
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.132
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00663
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.0101
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00316
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0238
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.0244
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.0283
AC:
7062
AN:
249520
Hom.:
208
AF XY:
0.0271
AC XY:
3662
AN XY:
135368
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0296
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0209
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.0190
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.136
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00703
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.0117
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0232
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.0251
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0259
AC:
37934
AN:
1461824
Hom.:
811
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0254
AC XY:
18483
AN XY:
727208
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.0263
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.0207
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.0206
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.142
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00761
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.0120
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.0241
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.0299
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0271
AC:
4130
AN:
152172
Hom.:
86
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0263
AC XY:
1958
AN XY:
74394
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.0293
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.0196
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.0245
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.133
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00664
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.0101
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.0238
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.0255
Alfa
AF:
0.0270
Hom.:
157
Bravo
AF:
0.0284
TwinsUK
AF:
0.0272
AC:
101
ALSPAC
AF:
0.0262
AC:
101
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.0293
AC:
109
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.0218
AC:
179
ExAC
AF:
0.0288
AC:
3475
Asia WGS
AF:
0.0660
AC:
230
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.0204
EpiControl
AF:
0.0229

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:8
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:4
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxSep 08, 2017This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingEurofins Ntd Llc (ga)Jul 28, 2017- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLaboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized MedicineMay 07, 2012Gly292Arg in Exon 07 of DFNB59: This variant is not expected to have clinical si gnificance because it has been identified in 2.9% (87/3024) of African American chromosomes from a broad population by the NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project (http: //evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS; dbSNP rs79399438). -
not provided Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP LaboratoriesOct 03, 2023- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAthena DiagnosticsOct 12, 2018- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeJan 31, 2024- -
Autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 59 Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaMar 06, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.30
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.61
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.52
Cadd
Uncertain
24
Dann
Uncertain
1.0
Eigen
Uncertain
0.34
Eigen_PC
Uncertain
0.48
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
0.96
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.0017
T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.38
T
MutationTaster
Benign
0.0046
P;P
PrimateAI
Uncertain
0.61
T
Polyphen
0.88
.;P;.;P;.;.;.;P
Vest4
0.23, 0.15
MutPred
0.85
.;Loss of sheet (P = 0.0228);.;Loss of sheet (P = 0.0228);.;.;.;Loss of sheet (P = 0.0228);
MPC
0.23
ClinPred
0.015
T
GERP RS
5.9
Varity_R
0.18
gMVP
0.56

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs79399438; hg19: chr2-179325816; COSMIC: COSV51845540; COSMIC: COSV51845540; API