rs794726878
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely pathogenic. The variant received 7 ACMG points: 7P and 0B. PP4_ModeratePM2_SupportingPM3_Strong
This summary comes from the ClinGen Evidence Repository: The NM_000203.5:c.53T>C variant in IDUA is a missense variant predicted to cause substitution of Leucine by Proline at amino acid 18 (p.Leu18Pro). This variant has been detected in at least 10 individuals with MPS I. This variant has been detected in at least 10 individuals with MPS I. Of those individuals, three were homozygous for the variant (PMID 25256405, max 2 x 0.5 = 1 point). Four of the remaining individuals are compound heterozygous for this variant and a second variant that has been classified as pathogenic or likely pathogenic for MPS I by the ClinGen Lysosomal Diseases VCEP including c.1205G>A p.(Trp402Ter) (ClinVar Variation ID: 11908) (PMID 31194252, at least one patient, phase not confirmed, 0.5 point), c.208C>T p.(Gln70Ter) (ClinVar Variation ID: 11909) (PMID 31194252, 255574391 2 patients, phase not confirmed, 2 x 0.5 point), and c.1487C>G p.(Pro496Arg) (PMID 31194252, 1 patient, phase not confirmed, 0.25 point). Two patients are compound heterozygous for the variant and c.1163C>A, p.(Thr388Lys), however the allelic data for these patients will be used to support the classification of Thr388Lys and is not included here in order to avoid circular logic (2.75 points, PM3_strong). One patient with this variant present in the homozygous state has been reported with a clinical diagnosis of attenuated MPS1, presenting with reduced IDUA enzyme activity (0.73 nmol/h/mg, reference range 32-56) and increased GAG excretion in urine (188ug GAGs/g creatinine, age-related reference 67-124). His brother, also homozygous for the variant is reported to have attenuated MPS1, with similar clinical features (PMID 25256405) (PP4_moderate). The highest population minor allele frequency in gnomAD v4.1.0 is 0.00002779 (1/35,980 alleles) in the Admixed American population, which is lower than the ClinGen Lysosomal Diseases VCEP’s threshold for PM2_Supporting (<0.00025), meeting this criterion (PM2_Supporting). The computational predictor REVEL gives a score of 0.319 which is neither above nor below the thresholds predicting a damaging (>0.644) or benign (<0.29) impact on IDUA function. There is a ClinVar entry for this variant (Variation ID: 193062). In summary, this variant meets the criteria to be classified as likely pathogenic for MPS I based on the IDUA-specific ACMG/AMP criteria applied, as specified by the ClinGen Lysosomal Diseases Variant Curation Expert Panel (specifications Version 1.0.0): PM3_strong, PP4_moderate, PM2_supporting.(Classification approved by the ClinGen Lysosomal Diseases Variant Curation Expert Panel on May 19, 2025). LINK:https://erepo.genome.network/evrepo/ui/classification/CA238566/MONDO:0001586/091
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000203.5 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_pathogenic. The variant received 7 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_000203.5. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IDUA | TSL:2 MANE Select | c.53T>C | p.Leu18Pro | missense | Exon 1 of 14 | ENSP00000425081.2 | P35475-1 | ||
| IDUA | TSL:1 | c.53T>C | p.Leu18Pro | missense | Exon 1 of 14 | ENSP00000247933.4 | P35475-1 | ||
| SLC26A1 | TSL:1 | c.576+3991A>G | intron | N/A | ENSP00000381532.2 | Q9H2B4-2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00000658 AC: 1AN: 151980Hom.: 0 Cov.: 36 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.00 AC: 0AN: 52646 AF XY: 0.00
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000236 AC: 3AN: 1271464Hom.: 0 Cov.: 36 AF XY: 0.00000480 AC XY: 3AN XY: 625068 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00000658 AC: 1AN: 151980Hom.: 0 Cov.: 36 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 74240 show subpopulations
ClinVar
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at