rs79586077
Positions:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -16 ACMG points: 0P and 16B. BP6_Very_StrongBA1
The ENST00000360796.10(BSCL2):c.765+15C>T variant causes a intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00683 in 1,613,842 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 634 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.037 ( 340 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0037 ( 294 hom. )
Consequence
BSCL2
ENST00000360796.10 intron
ENST00000360796.10 intron
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: -0.268
Genes affected
BSCL2 (HGNC:15832): (BSCL2 lipid droplet biogenesis associated, seipin) This gene encodes the multi-pass transmembrane protein protein seipin. This protein localizes to the endoplasmic reticulum and may be important for lipid droplet morphology. Mutations in this gene have been associated with congenital generalized lipodystrophy type 2 or Berardinelli-Seip syndrome, a rare autosomal recessive disease characterized by a near absence of adipose tissue and severe insulin resistance. Alternatively spliced transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. Naturally occurring read-through transcription occurs between this locus and the neighboring locus HNRNPUL2 (heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein U-like 2).[provided by RefSeq, Mar 2011]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -16 ACMG points.
BP6
Variant 11-62692648-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr11-62692648-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 257499.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr11-62692648-G-A is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AFR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.124 is higher than 0.05.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSCL2 | NM_001122955.4 | c.765+15C>T | intron_variant | ENST00000360796.10 | NP_001116427.1 | |||
HNRNPUL2-BSCL2 | NR_037946.1 | n.3285+15C>T | intron_variant, non_coding_transcript_variant |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSCL2 | ENST00000360796.10 | c.765+15C>T | intron_variant | 1 | NM_001122955.4 | ENSP00000354032 | A2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0368 AC: 5598AN: 152086Hom.: 340 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
5598
AN:
152086
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00974 AC: 2447AN: 251228Hom.: 122 AF XY: 0.00705 AC XY: 957AN XY: 135794
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
2447
AN:
251228
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
957
AN XY:
135794
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00370 AC: 5412AN: 1461638Hom.: 294 Cov.: 34 AF XY: 0.00323 AC XY: 2348AN XY: 727120
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
5412
AN:
1461638
Hom.:
Cov.:
34
AF XY:
AC XY:
2348
AN XY:
727120
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0368 AC: 5607AN: 152204Hom.: 340 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0351 AC XY: 2614AN XY: 74418
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
5607
AN:
152204
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
2614
AN XY:
74418
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
18
AN:
3478
ClinVar
Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:6
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Mar 03, 2015 | - - |
not specified Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | - | - - |
Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 2 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 31, 2024 | - - |
Congenital generalized lipodystrophy type 2 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Neuronopathy, distal hereditary motor, type 5A Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
DS_DG_spliceai
Position offset: 6
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at