rs796052147
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. The variant received 0 ACMG points: 2P and 2B. PM2BP4_Moderate
The NM_001146197.3(LRTM3):c.9652A>T(p.Met3218Leu) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000000715 in 1,398,164 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 9/11 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. No clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar. Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. M3218V) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001146197.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Uncertain_significance. The variant received 0 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_001146197.3. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
RefSeq Transcripts
| Selected | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LRTM3 | NM_001146197.3 | MANE Select | c.9652A>T | p.Met3218Leu | missense | Exon 4 of 4 | NP_001139669.1 |
Ensembl Transcripts
| Selected | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CCDC168 | ENST00000322527.4 | TSL:3 MANE Select | c.9652A>T | p.Met3218Leu | missense | Exon 4 of 4 | ENSP00000320232.3 | ||
| ENSG00000286312 | ENST00000771848.1 | n.194+9133T>A | intron | N/A |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 33
GnomAD4 exome AF: 7.15e-7 AC: 1AN: 1398164Hom.: 0 Cov.: 39 AF XY: 0.00000145 AC XY: 1AN XY: 689644 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 33
ClinVar
Not reported inComputational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at