rs7963963
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1
The NM_001145026.2(PTPRQ):c.5075T>C(p.Ile1692Thr) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0309 in 1,545,564 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 2,365 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. I1692I) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001145026.2 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PTPRQ | NM_001145026.2 | c.5075T>C | p.Ile1692Thr | missense_variant | 29/45 | ENST00000644991.3 | |
LOC105369867 | XR_007063388.1 | n.131-33339A>G | intron_variant, non_coding_transcript_variant |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PTPRQ | ENST00000644991.3 | c.5075T>C | p.Ile1692Thr | missense_variant | 29/45 | NM_001145026.2 | P2 | ||
PTPRQ | ENST00000616559.4 | c.5201T>C | p.Ile1734Thr | missense_variant | 30/45 | 5 | A2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes ? AF: 0.0791 AC: 11886AN: 150318Hom.: 1144 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0296 AC: 4510AN: 152480Hom.: 231 AF XY: 0.0265 AC XY: 2148AN XY: 80944
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0257 AC: 35795AN: 1395128Hom.: 1215 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.0249 AC XY: 17134AN XY: 688104
GnomAD4 genome ? AF: 0.0792 AC: 11919AN: 150436Hom.: 1150 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0767 AC XY: 5638AN XY: 73506
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Athena Diagnostics | May 24, 2018 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Aug 21, 2018 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at