rs797045630

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -10 ACMG points: 0P and 10B. BP4_StrongBP6BP7BS2

The NM_001111125.3(IQSEC2):c.3735C>T(p.His1245His) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000206 in 1,129,052 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. There are 91 hemizygotes in GnomAD. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00016 ( 0 hom., 4 hem., cov: 21)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00021 ( 0 hom. 87 hem. )

Consequence

IQSEC2
NM_001111125.3 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:5

Conservation

PhyloP100: 1.08

Variant links:

Genes affected

IQSEC2 (HGNC:29059): (IQ motif and Sec7 domain ArfGEF 2) This gene encodes a guanine nucleotide exchange factor for the ARF family of small GTP-binding proteins. The encoded protein is a component of the postsynaptic density at excitatory synapses, and may play a critical role in cytoskeletal and synaptic organization through the activation of selected ARF substrates including ARF1 and ARF6. Mutations in this gene have been implicated in nonsyndromic X-linked cognitive disability. Alternatively spliced transcript variants encoding multiple isoforms have been observed for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2011]

IQSEC2 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -10 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.74).

BP6

Variant X-53234951-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chrX-53234951-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 211207.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=3, Uncertain_significance=1}. Variant chrX-53234951-G-A is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=1.08 with no splicing effect.

BS2

High Hemizygotes in GnomAd4 at 4 XL gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
IQSEC2	NM_001111125.3 link	c.3735C>T	p.His1245His	synonymous_variant	Exon 15 of 15	ENST00000642864.1	NP_001104595.1	Q5JU85-2

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
IQSEC2	ENST00000642864.1 link	c.3735C>T	p.His1245His	synonymous_variant	Exon 15 of 15		NM_001111125.3	ENSP00000495726.1		Q5JU85-2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.000161

AC:

AN:

111534

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000118

AC XY:

AN XY:

33796

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.000130

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.000265

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.0000475

AC:

AN:

105159

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.0000558

AC XY:

AN XY:

35815

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.0000966

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.0000997

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000211

AC:

215

AN:

1017518

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000271

AC XY:

AN XY:

320650

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.0000414

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.0000369

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.0000559

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.000142

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.000252

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.000163

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.000161

AC:

AN:

111534

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000118

AC XY:

AN XY:

33796

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.000130

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.000265

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00

Alfa

AF:

0.000285

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.000162

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:5

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified

Uncertain:1Benign:1

Oct 26, 2017

GeneDx

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Oct 21, 2014

Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

not provided

Benign:2

Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Intellectual disability, X-linked 1

Benign:1

Jan 17, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Inborn genetic diseases

Benign:1

Oct 23, 2019

Ambry Genetics

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.74

CADD

Benign

2.7

DANN

Benign

0.29

RBP_binding_hub_radar

0.0

RBP_regulation_power_radar

1.7

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over