rs79708848

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -13 ACMG points: 0P and 13B. BP4_StrongBP6BS1BS2

The NM_025137.4(SPG11):​c.1698T>G​(p.Asp566Glu) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0162 in 1,609,150 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 286 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. D566N) has been classified as Uncertain significance.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.012 ( 21 hom., cov: 31)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.017 ( 265 hom. )

Consequence

SPG11
NM_025137.4 missense

Scores

1
16

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:11

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.131

Publications

12 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
SPG11 (HGNC:11226): (SPG11 vesicle trafficking associated, spatacsin) The protein encoded by this gene is a potential transmembrane protein that is phosphorylated upon DNA damage. Defects in this gene are a cause of spastic paraplegia type 11 (SPG11). Multiple transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, May 2009]
SPG11 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • hereditary spastic paraplegia 11
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: ClinGen, Orphanet, Genomics England PanelApp, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Illumina, G2P
  • amyotrophic lateral sclerosis type 5
    Inheritance: AR Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Genomics England PanelApp
  • Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease axonal type 2X
    Inheritance: AR Classification: STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Orphanet, Genomics England PanelApp
  • juvenile amyotrophic lateral sclerosis
    Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -13 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.004883647).
BP6
Variant 15-44633542-A-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr15-44633542-A-C is described in ClinVar as Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity. ClinVar VariationId is 219609.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.0119 (1810/152096) while in subpopulation NFE AF = 0.0199 (1355/67968). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0191. There are 21 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 830 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 31. This position passed quality control check.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 21 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
SPG11NM_025137.4 linkc.1698T>G p.Asp566Glu missense_variant Exon 8 of 40 ENST00000261866.12 NP_079413.3

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
SPG11ENST00000261866.12 linkc.1698T>G p.Asp566Glu missense_variant Exon 8 of 40 1 NM_025137.4 ENSP00000261866.7

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0119
AC:
1811
AN:
151980
Hom.:
21
Cov.:
31
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00268
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.0230
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00702
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00635
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00166
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.0148
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0199
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.0143
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.0110
AC:
2749
AN:
250768
AF XY:
0.0107
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00278
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00476
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00348
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.0172
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0179
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.0124
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0166
AC:
24242
AN:
1457054
Hom.:
265
Cov.:
30
AF XY:
0.0161
AC XY:
11658
AN XY:
725196
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.00231
AC:
77
AN:
33390
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00573
AC:
256
AN:
44674
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00445
AC:
116
AN:
26096
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.0000504
AC:
2
AN:
39644
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00127
AC:
109
AN:
85996
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.0178
AC:
953
AN:
53406
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.000521
AC:
3
AN:
5756
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0197
AC:
21863
AN:
1107844
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.0143
AC:
863
AN:
60248
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.451
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
1004
2008
3013
4017
5021
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
788
1576
2364
3152
3940
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0119
AC:
1810
AN:
152096
Hom.:
21
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.0112
AC XY:
830
AN XY:
74372
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.00267
AC:
111
AN:
41508
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00701
AC:
107
AN:
15272
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00635
AC:
22
AN:
3464
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5184
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00166
AC:
8
AN:
4818
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.0148
AC:
156
AN:
10564
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
292
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0199
AC:
1355
AN:
67968
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.0142
AC:
30
AN:
2114
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.496
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
84
168
253
337
421
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
22
44
66
88
110
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.0161
Hom.:
86
Bravo
AF:
0.0107
TwinsUK
AF:
0.0200
AC:
74
ALSPAC
AF:
0.0200
AC:
77
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.00341
AC:
15
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.0184
AC:
158
ExAC
AF:
0.0111
AC:
1349
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00115
AC:
4
AN:
3476
EpiCase
AF:
0.0151
EpiControl
AF:
0.0174

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:11
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:6
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

Dec 10, 2021
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Aug 08, 2016
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease.

Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

Aug 02, 2017
Athena Diagnostics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Hereditary spastic paraplegia 11 Benign:4
Feb 01, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease.

Oct 09, 2014
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Dec 02, 2016
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis Uncertain:1
Sep 09, 2020
UM ALS/MND Lab, University Of Malta
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:case-control

Hereditary spastic paraplegia Benign:1
Mar 13, 2021
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, The Hospital for Sick Children
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.11
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.41
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.35
CADD
Benign
3.4
DANN
Benign
0.96
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.011
T;.;T;.;.
Eigen
Benign
-0.29
Eigen_PC
Benign
-0.26
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.28
N
LIST_S2
Benign
0.72
T;T;T;T;T
MetaRNN
Benign
0.0049
T;T;T;T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.93
T
MutationAssessor
Uncertain
2.7
M;M;.;M;.
PhyloP100
-0.13
PrimateAI
Benign
0.33
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-0.45
N;N;N;N;N
REVEL
Benign
0.10
Sift
Benign
0.58
T;T;T;T;T
Sift4G
Benign
0.30
T;T;T;T;T
Vest4
0.20
ClinPred
0.021
T
GERP RS
1.4
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.7
Varity_R
0.031
gMVP
0.12
Mutation Taster
=97/3
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs79708848; hg19: chr15-44925740; COSMIC: COSV55990757; API