rs7971699

Variant names:

• chr12-88062672-T-A
• rs7971699
• NM_025114.4:c.6357+20A>T

Your query was ambiguous. Multiple possible variants found:

• chr12-88062672-T-A
• chr12-88062672-T-C

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_Strong BP6_Very_Strong BA1

The NM_025114.4(CEP290):​c.6357+20A>T variant causes a intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00963 in 1,542,636 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1,256 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

• Frequency:
  • Genomes: 𝑓 0.051 (681 hom., cov: 32)
  • Exomes 𝑓: 0.0051 (575 hom.)
• Consequence: CEP290 NM_025114.4 intron
• Clinical Significance: Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:5
• Conservation: PhyloP100: -0.0310

Genes affected

CEP290 (HGNC:29021): (centrosomal protein 290) This gene encodes a protein with 13 putative coiled-coil domains, a region with homology to SMC chromosome segregation ATPases, six KID motifs, three tropomyosin homology domains and an ATP/GTP binding site motif A. The protein is localized to the centrosome and cilia and has sites for N-glycosylation, tyrosine sulfation, phosphorylation, N-myristoylation, and amidation. Mutations in this gene have been associated with Joubert syndrome and nephronophthisis and the presence of antibodies against this protein is associated with several forms of cancer. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

LOC124902977 (HGNC:):

ACMG classification

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.

• BP4: Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.84).
• BP6: Variant 12-88062672-T-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr12-88062672-T-A is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 126266.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr12-88062672-T-A is described in Lovd as [Benign].
• BA1: GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AFR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.175 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
CEP290	NM_025114.4	c.6357+20A>T		intron_variant	Intron 46 of 53	ENST00000552810.6	NP_079390.3

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
CEP290	ENST00000552810.6	c.6357+20A>T		intron_variant	Intron 46 of 53	1	NM_025114.4	ENSP00000448012.1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0512 AC: 7792 AN: 152134 Hom.: 680 Cov.: 32

Gnomad AFR AF: 0.178

Gnomad AMI AF: 0.00

Gnomad AMR AF: 0.0212

Gnomad ASJ AF: 0.00

Gnomad EAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad SAS AF: 0.000621

Gnomad FIN AF: 0.00

Gnomad MID AF: 0.00

Gnomad NFE AF: 0.000353

Gnomad OTH AF: 0.0315

GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0123 AC: 2743 AN: 222284 Hom.: 221 AF XY: 0.00931 AC XY: 1112 AN XY: 119456

Gnomad AFR exome AF: 0.178

Gnomad AMR exome AF: 0.00693

Gnomad ASJ exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad EAS exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad SAS exome AF: 0.000371

Gnomad FIN exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad NFE exome AF: 0.000254

Gnomad OTH exome AF: 0.00580

GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00507 AC: 7050 AN: 1390384 Hom.: 575 Cov.: 22 AF XY: 0.00436 AC XY: 3024 AN XY: 693248

Gnomad4 AFR exome AF: 0.181

Gnomad4 AMR exome AF: 0.00866

Gnomad4 ASJ exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome AF: 0.000428

Gnomad4 FIN exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome AF: 0.000137

Gnomad4 OTH exome AF: 0.0112

GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0513 AC: 7803 AN: 152252 Hom.: 681 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0494 AC XY: 3680 AN XY: 74448

Gnomad4 AFR AF: 0.178

Gnomad4 AMR AF: 0.0211

Gnomad4 ASJ AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 EAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 SAS AF: 0.000621

Gnomad4 FIN AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 NFE AF: 0.000353

Gnomad4 OTH AF: 0.0312

Alfa AF: 0.0248 Hom.: 45

Bravo AF: 0.0583

Asia WGS AF: 0.00751 AC: 26 AN: 3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign

Submissions summary: Benign:5

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:3

Jan 30, 2014

GeneDx

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

-

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

-

Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

Likely benign based on allele frequency in 1000 Genomes Project or ESP global frequency and its presence in a patient with a rare or unrelated disease phenotype. NOT Sanger confirmed. -

not provided Benign:1

-

Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: not provided

- -

Meckel-Gruber syndrome;C0431399:Familial aplasia of the vermis;C0687120:Nephronophthisis Benign:1

Feb 03, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name	Calibrated prediction	Score	Prediction
BayesDel_noAF	Benign	-0.84
CADD	Benign	1.6
DANN	Benign	0.58

Splicing

Name	Calibrated prediction	Score	Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)		0.0		Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs7971699; hg19: chr12-88456449;