rs80258442

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1

The NM_000368.5(TSC1):​c.106+15A>G variant causes a intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00234 in 1,613,860 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 129 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0028 ( 12 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0023 ( 117 hom. )

Consequence

TSC1
NM_000368.5 intron

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:10O:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.926

Publications

1 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
TSC1 (HGNC:12362): (TSC complex subunit 1) This gene is a tumor suppressor gene that encodes the growth inhibitory protein hamartin. The encoded protein interacts with and stabilizes the GTPase activating protein tuberin. This hamartin-tuberin complex negatively regulates mammalian target of rapamycin complex 1 (mTORC1) signaling which is a major regulator of anabolic cell growth. This protein also functions as a co-chaperone for Hsp90 that inhibits its ATPase activity. This protein functions as a facilitator of Hsp90-mediated folding of kinase and non-kinase clients, including TSC2 and thereby preventing their ubiquitination and proteasomal degradation. Mutations in this gene have been associated with tuberous sclerosis and lymphangioleiomyomatosis. [provided by RefSeq, May 2022]
TSC1 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • tuberous sclerosis
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
  • tuberous sclerosis 1
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, PanelApp Australia, Genomics England PanelApp, G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
  • lung lymphangioleiomyomatosis
    Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp
  • tuberous sclerosis complex
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.7).
BP6
Variant 9-132928752-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr9-132928752-T-C is described in ClinVar as Benign. ClinVar VariationId is 48737.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (EAS) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.0621 is higher than 0.05.

Variant Effect in Transcripts

ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_000368.5. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.

RefSeq Transcripts

Selected
GeneTranscriptTagsHGVScHGVSpEffectExon RankProteinUniProt
TSC1
NM_000368.5
MANE Select
c.106+15A>G
intron
N/ANP_000359.1
TSC1
NM_001406592.1
c.106+15A>G
intron
N/ANP_001393521.1
TSC1
NM_001406593.1
c.106+15A>G
intron
N/ANP_001393522.1

Ensembl Transcripts

Selected
GeneTranscriptTagsHGVScHGVSpEffectExon RankProteinUniProt
TSC1
ENST00000298552.9
TSL:1 MANE Select
c.106+15A>G
intron
N/AENSP00000298552.3
TSC1
ENST00000490179.4
TSL:3
c.106+15A>G
intron
N/AENSP00000495533.2
TSC1
ENST00000403810.6
TSL:1
c.106+15A>G
intron
N/AENSP00000386093.1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00279
AC:
425
AN:
152240
Hom.:
12
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0000241
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.0252
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000393
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00259
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.0684
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00269
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000220
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.000956
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.00536
AC:
1343
AN:
250390
AF XY:
0.00497
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0000868
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.000596
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.0701
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000186
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00114
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00229
AC:
3349
AN:
1461502
Hom.:
117
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.00223
AC XY:
1621
AN XY:
727082
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
33480
American (AMR)
AF:
0.0000671
AC:
3
AN:
44722
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00107
AC:
28
AN:
26134
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.0753
AC:
2988
AN:
39692
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.000765
AC:
66
AN:
86248
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.0000941
AC:
5
AN:
53156
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.000520
AC:
3
AN:
5766
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.000117
AC:
130
AN:
1111920
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00209
AC:
126
AN:
60384
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.496
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
175
349
524
698
873
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
54
108
162
216
270
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00277
AC:
422
AN:
152358
Hom.:
12
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00319
AC XY:
238
AN XY:
74516
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0000240
AC:
1
AN:
41590
American (AMR)
AF:
0.000392
AC:
6
AN:
15298
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00259
AC:
9
AN:
3472
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.0680
AC:
353
AN:
5192
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00269
AC:
13
AN:
4826
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
10624
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.000220
AC:
15
AN:
68036
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.000946
AC:
2
AN:
2114
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.501
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
21
43
64
86
107
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
10
20
30
40
50
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.000762
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.00303
Asia WGS
AF:
0.0210
AC:
72
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:10Other:1
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Tuberous sclerosis 1 Benign:4
Jul 07, 2023
KCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease.

Nov 07, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Feb 04, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

not specified Benign:3
Feb 21, 2013
Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

106+15A>G in intron 3 of TSC1: This variant is not expected to have clinical sig nificance because it is not located within the conserved splice consensus sequen ce. It has been identified in 9.6% (17/178) of Japanese chromosomes from a broad population by the 1000 Genomes Project (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/projects/SN P; dbSNP rs80258442).

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Oct 14, 2013
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease.

Tuberous sclerosis syndrome Benign:1Other:1
Sep 08, 2021
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Tuberous sclerosis database (TSC1)
Significance:not provided
Review Status:no classification provided
Collection Method:curation

not provided Benign:1
May 26, 2016
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Variant summary: The TSC1 c.106+15A>G variant involves the alteration of a non-conserved intronic nucleotide. One in silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant along with 5/5 in silico splice prediction tools predicting the variant not to have an impact on normal splicing. This variant was found in 630/119968 control chromosomes (26 homozygotes), predominantly observed in the East Asian subpopulation (25 homozygotes) at a frequency of 0.0705565 (601/8518). This frequency greatly exceeds the estimated maximal expected allele frequency of a pathogenic TSC1 variant (0.000025), suggesting this is likely a benign polymorphism found primarily in populations of East Asian origin. In addition, one clinical diagnostic laboratory classified this variant as Benign. Taken together, this variant is classified as Benign.

Isolated focal cortical dysplasia type II Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease.

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.9

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.70
CADD
Benign
5.1
DANN
Benign
0.66
PhyloP100
-0.93
PromoterAI
-0.0054
Neutral
Mutation Taster
=100/0
polymorphism (auto)

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.010
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs80258442; hg19: chr9-135804139; API