rs80302667
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points: 0P and 19B. BP4_ModerateBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2
The NM_000090.4(COL3A1):c.1770T>C(p.Pro590=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00244 in 1,613,776 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 98 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.014 ( 47 hom., cov: 30)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0013 ( 51 hom. )
Consequence
COL3A1
NM_000090.4 synonymous
NM_000090.4 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 1.81
Genes affected
COL3A1 (HGNC:2201): (collagen type III alpha 1 chain) This gene encodes the pro-alpha1 chains of type III collagen, a fibrillar collagen that is found in extensible connective tissues such as skin, lung, uterus, intestine and the vascular system, frequently in association with type I collagen. Mutations in this gene are associated with Ehlers-Danlos syndrome type IV, and with aortic and arterial aneurysms. [provided by R. Dalgleish, Feb 2008]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points.
BP4
?
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.42).
BP6
?
Variant 2-188997173-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr2-188997173-T-C is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 136844.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr2-188997173-T-C is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BP7
?
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=1.81 with no splicing effect.
BS1
?
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.0136 (2063/152116) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.0477 (1977/41462). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0459. There are 47 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 970 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
?
High Homozygotes in GnomAd at 47 AD,AR gene
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COL3A1 | NM_000090.4 | c.1770T>C | p.Pro590= | synonymous_variant | 25/51 | ENST00000304636.9 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COL3A1 | ENST00000304636.9 | c.1770T>C | p.Pro590= | synonymous_variant | 25/51 | 1 | NM_000090.4 | P1 | |
COL3A1 | ENST00000450867.2 | c.1671T>C | p.Pro557= | synonymous_variant | 24/50 | 1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes ? AF: 0.0135 AC: 2057AN: 151998Hom.: 47 Cov.: 30
GnomAD3 genomes
?
AF:
AC:
2057
AN:
151998
Hom.:
Cov.:
30
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00310 AC: 780AN: 251304Hom.: 23 AF XY: 0.00219 AC XY: 297AN XY: 135860
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
780
AN:
251304
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
297
AN XY:
135860
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00128 AC: 1877AN: 1461660Hom.: 51 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.00114 AC XY: 832AN XY: 727162
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
1877
AN:
1461660
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
AC XY:
832
AN XY:
727162
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome ? AF: 0.0136 AC: 2063AN: 152116Hom.: 47 Cov.: 30 AF XY: 0.0130 AC XY: 970AN XY: 74366
GnomAD4 genome
?
AF:
AC:
2063
AN:
152116
Hom.:
Cov.:
30
AF XY:
AC XY:
970
AN XY:
74366
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
5
AN:
3478
ClinVar
Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:10
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, type 4 Benign:4
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Cohesion Phenomics | Sep 23, 2022 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Invitae | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | All of Us Research Program, National Institutes of Health | Feb 05, 2024 | - - |
not specified Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Feb 01, 2013 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | - | - - |
Familial thoracic aortic aneurysm and aortic dissection Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Jan 07, 2016 | This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health | Mar 16, 2018 | - - |
Ehlers-Danlos syndrome Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, The Hospital for Sick Children | Apr 12, 2021 | - - |
not provided Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Jan 29, 2021 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
Cadd
Benign
Dann
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at