rs80320923

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2

The NM_001164508.2(NEB):c.11769T>C(p.Ile3923Ile) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00154 in 1,613,844 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 33 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0083 ( 17 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00083 ( 16 hom. )

Consequence

NEB
NM_001164508.2 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:7

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.219

Variant links:

Genes affected

NEB (HGNC:7720): (nebulin) This gene encodes nebulin, a giant protein component of the cytoskeletal matrix that coexists with the thick and thin filaments within the sarcomeres of skeletal muscle. In most vertebrates, nebulin accounts for 3 to 4% of the total myofibrillar protein. The encoded protein contains approximately 30-amino acid long modules that can be classified into 7 types and other repeated modules. Protein isoform sizes vary from 600 to 800 kD due to alternative splicing that is tissue-, species-,and developmental stage-specific. Of the 183 exons in the nebulin gene, at least 43 are alternatively spliced, although exons 143 and 144 are not found in the same transcript. Of the several thousand transcript variants predicted for nebulin, the RefSeq Project has decided to create three representative RefSeq records. Mutations in this gene are associated with recessive nemaline myopathy. [provided by RefSeq, Sep 2009]

NEB links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.49).

BP6

Variant 2-151612222-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr2-151612222-A-G is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 129708.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.219 with no splicing effect.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00828 (1261/152268) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.0289 (1202/41542). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0276. There are 17 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 590 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.

BS2

High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 17 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
NEB	NM_001164507.2 link	c.11769T>C	p.Ile3923Ile	synonymous_variant	Exon 78 of 182	ENST00000427231.7	NP_001157979.2
NEB	NM_001164508.2 link	c.11769T>C	p.Ile3923Ile	synonymous_variant	Exon 78 of 182	ENST00000397345.8	NP_001157980.2

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	UniProt
NEB	ENST00000397345.8 link	c.11769T>C	p.Ile3923Ile	synonymous_variant	Exon 78 of 182	5	NM_001164508.2	ENSP00000380505.3	P20929-2
NEB	ENST00000427231.7 link	c.11769T>C	p.Ile3923Ile	synonymous_variant	Exon 78 of 182	5	NM_001164507.2	ENSP00000416578.2	P20929-3
NEB	ENST00000409198.5 link	c.11040T>C	p.Ile3680Ile	synonymous_variant	Exon 75 of 150	5		ENSP00000386259.1	P20929-4

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.00826

AC:

1257

AN:

152150

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0289

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00275

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.000103

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00526

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.00222

AC:

553

AN:

248900

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.00155

AC XY:

209

AN XY:

135022

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.0307

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00162

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.0000710

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00215

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000834

AC:

1219

AN:

1461576

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000706

AC XY:

513

AN XY:

727082

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.0300

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.00168

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.0000232

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.0000369

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.00154

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.00828

AC:

1261

AN:

152268

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00793

AC XY:

590

AN XY:

74442

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.0289

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.00268

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.000103

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00520

Alfa

AF:

0.00651

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.00946

Asia WGS

AF:

0.00115

AC:

AN:

3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign

Submissions summary: Benign:7

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Nemaline myopathy 2

Benign:3

Jan 29, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jan 12, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Sep 16, 2020

Natera, Inc.

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

not specified

Benign:2

Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

Likely benign based on allele frequency in 1000 Genomes Project or ESP global frequency and its presence in a patient with a rare or unrelated disease phenotype. NOT Sanger confirmed. -

Jan 19, 2017

GeneDx

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

not provided

Benign:2

Jun 11, 2018

Athena Diagnostics

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: not provided

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.49

CADD

Benign

6.0

DANN

Benign

0.73

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over