rs80338879
Variant summary
Our verdict is Pathogenic. Variant got 12 ACMG points: 12P and 0B. PVS1PM2PP5_Moderate
The NM_001206855.3(TFR2):c.2T>A(p.Met1?) variant causes a start lost change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000618 in 1,457,080 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Pathogenic (★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001206855.3 start_lost
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Pathogenic. Variant got 12 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 30
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00000835 AC: 2AN: 239618Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.0000152 AC XY: 2AN XY: 131374
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000618 AC: 9AN: 1457080Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.00000690 AC XY: 5AN XY: 725102
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 30
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Hemochromatosis type 3 Pathogenic:2Other:1
- -
Variant summary: TFR2 c.515T>A (p.Met172Lys) results in a non-conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Three of five in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 8.3e-06 in 239618 control chromosomes (gnomAD). c.515T>A has been reported in the literature in individuals affected with Hemochromatosis Type 3 (e.g. Roetto_2001, Majore_2006). These data indicate that the variant is very likely to be associated with disease. At least one publication reports experimental evidence evaluating an impact on protein function, finding that the variant results in retention in the ER (Wallace_2008). The following publications have been ascertained in the context of this evaluation (PMID: 11313241, 16923517, 18094142). ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 5382). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as pathogenic. -
- -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at