rs80338949

Variant summary

Our verdict is Uncertain significance. Variant got 2 ACMG points: 4P and 2B. PM1PM5BP4_Moderate

The NM_004004.6(GJB2):​c.487A>G​(p.Met163Val) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000929 in 1,614,088 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. M163L) has been classified as Pathogenic.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00011 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.000091 ( 1 hom. )

Consequence

GJB2
NM_004004.6 missense

Scores

4
9
6

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications P:3U:9O:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: 6.20
Variant links:
Genes affected
GJB2 (HGNC:4284): (gap junction protein beta 2) This gene encodes a member of the gap junction protein family. The gap junctions were first characterized by electron microscopy as regionally specialized structures on plasma membranes of contacting adherent cells. These structures were shown to consist of cell-to-cell channels that facilitate the transfer of ions and small molecules between cells. The gap junction proteins, also known as connexins, purified from fractions of enriched gap junctions from different tissues differ. According to sequence similarities at the nucleotide and amino acid levels, the gap junction proteins are divided into two categories, alpha and beta. Mutations in this gene are responsible for as much as 50% of pre-lingual, recessive deafness. [provided by RefSeq, Oct 2008]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Uncertain_significance. Variant got 2 ACMG points.

PM1
In a chain Gap junction beta-2 protein (size 225) in uniprot entity CXB2_HUMAN there are 70 pathogenic changes around while only 16 benign (81%) in NM_004004.6
PM5
Other missense variant is known to change same aminoacid residue: Variant chr13-20189095-T-G is described in Lovd as [Pathogenic].
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.22010407).

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE Protein UniProt
GJB2NM_004004.6 linkuse as main transcriptc.487A>G p.Met163Val missense_variant 2/2 ENST00000382848.5 NP_003995.2
GJB2XM_011535049.3 linkuse as main transcriptc.487A>G p.Met163Val missense_variant 2/2 XP_011533351.1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
GJB2ENST00000382848.5 linkuse as main transcriptc.487A>G p.Met163Val missense_variant 2/21 NM_004004.6 ENSP00000372299 P1
GJB2ENST00000382844.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.487A>G p.Met163Val missense_variant 1/1 ENSP00000372295 P1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000112
AC:
17
AN:
152182
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00769
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0000655
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.000414
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00316
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0000882
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.000143
AC:
36
AN:
251140
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.000192
AC XY:
26
AN XY:
135762
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0000289
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.0000993
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.000752
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0000881
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000163
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0000910
AC:
133
AN:
1461788
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.000120
AC XY:
87
AN XY:
727176
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.0000299
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.0000383
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.0000252
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.000881
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.0000306
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.000232
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000112
AC:
17
AN:
152300
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.000134
AC XY:
10
AN XY:
74472
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.0000654
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.000414
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.0000882
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00
Alfa
AF:
0.0000975
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.000159
ExAC
AF:
0.000165
AC:
20
Asia WGS
AF:
0.000289
AC:
1
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.000327
EpiControl
AF:
0.0000593

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Pathogenic:3Uncertain:9Other:1
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Uncertain:5
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxMar 05, 2024In silico analysis supports that this missense variant does not alter protein structure/function; Observed in the heterozygous state with no other GJB2 variant in multiple individuals with hearing loss in published literature (PMID: 11493200, 19929407, 12189487, 20086306); Published functional studies demonstrate a damaging effect on gap junction function (PMID: 28428247, 12505163); Observed in unaffected parents of children with hearing loss who were heterozygous for the variant in published literature (PMID: 28263784, 19715472); This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 25388846, 19941053, 12505163, 20086291, 24529908, 22208444, 24158611, 12189487, 21996152, 14643477, 21388256, 22695344, 19929407, 15964725, 30989077, 19715472, 20086306, 16380907, 17041943, 12872268, 31620696, 34426522, 34335733, Chaleshtori2005[article], 33096615, 31569309, 21281533, 31412945, 37892203, 37106706, 36833326, 38378725, 11493200, 28428247, 28263784, 26096904) -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpSep 26, 2022This sequence change replaces methionine, which is neutral and non-polar, with valine, which is neutral and non-polar, at codon 163 of the GJB2 protein (p.Met163Val). This variant is present in population databases (rs80338949, gnomAD 0.07%). This missense change has been observed in individual(s) with deafness (PMID: 11493200, 12189487, 21281533, 22208444, 26096904). ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 21388). Advanced modeling of protein sequence and biophysical properties (such as structural, functional, and spatial information, amino acid conservation, physicochemical variation, residue mobility, and thermodynamic stability) has been performed at Invitae for this missense variant, however the output from this modeling did not meet the statistical confidence thresholds required to predict the impact of this variant on GJB2 protein function. Experimental studies have shown that this missense change affects GJB2 function (PMID: 12505163, 28428247). In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCeGaT Center for Human Genetics TuebingenJan 01, 2023GJB2: PS4:Supporting -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLaboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized MedicineJun 30, 2022The p.Met163Val variant in GJB2 has been identified in >10 probands with non-syndromic hearing loss from several ethnic populations; however, a pathogenic variant on the second allele of GJB2 was not detected in any of these probands (Al-Qahtani 2010, Amorini 2015, Bayazit 2003, Bonyadi 2009, Bonyadi 2014, Chaleshtori 2002, Chaleshtori 2005, Dalamon 2005, Falah 2012, Gunther 2003, Janecke 2002, Mahdieh 2011, Marlin 2001, Padma 2009, Tang 2006, Yilmaz 2010). In two families with post-lingual progressive hearing loss described in one study, two parent-to-child segregations were reported for this variant suggesting that the variant may lead to autosomal dominant hearing loss (Falah 2012). However, the majority of probands in the other studies did not report autosomal dominant inheritance of hearing loss. Two other missense variants at the same amino acid position (p.Met163Leu and p.Met163Thr) have also been reported in individuals with hearing loss, and in vitro functional studies of the p.Met163Val and p.Met163Leu show an impact to the normal activity of the protein due to these variants (Bruzzone 2003, Matos 2008). This data suggests that variants at this amino acid position are not tolerated. The p.Met163Val variant has also been identified 10/16478 South Asian chromosomes by the Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC, http://exac.broadinstitute.org; dbSNP rs80338949); however this frequency is not high enough to rule out pathogenicity. In summary, the presence of the p.Met163Val variant in several affected individuals and the functional data suggests a pathogenic role for the variant, however the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty given the absence of a second pathogenic variant in heterozygous probands and limited segregation data. ACMG/AMP Criteria applied:BS1, PP3. -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingRevvity Omics, RevvityMay 07, 2021- -
Autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 1A Pathogenic:1Uncertain:1Other:1
not provided, no classification providedliterature onlyGeneReviews-- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenome-Nilou LabJul 22, 2021- -
Likely pathogenic, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingNeuberg Centre For Genomic Medicine, NCGMMar 01, 2023The missense c.487A>G(p.Met163Val) variant in GJB2 gene has been reported previously in heterozygous state in multiple individuals affected with GJB2-related hearing loss (Smith et. al., 2016; Günther et. al., 2003). This variant has been observed to segregate with disease in related individuals (Falah et. al., 2012). Functional studies demonstrate a damaging effect on gap junction function, impacting GJB2 function (Press ER, et. al., 2017; Bruzzone R, et. al.,2003). The p.Met163Val variant has been reported with allele frequency of 0.01% in gnomAD Exomes and is novel (not in any individuals) in 1000 Genomes. This variant has been reported to the ClinVar database as Uncertain Significance / Likely Pathogenic. The amino acid change p.Met163Val in GJB2 is predicted as conserved by GERP++ and PhyloP across 100 vertebrates. The amino acid Met at position 163 is changed to a Val changing protein sequence and it might alter its composition and physico-chemical properties. For these reasons, this variant has been classified as Pathogenic. -
Autosomal dominant nonsyndromic hearing loss 3A Pathogenic:1Uncertain:1
Pathogenic, criteria provided, single submitterresearchLaboratory of Prof. Karen Avraham, Tel Aviv UniversityMay 08, 2024Pathogenic by Deafness Variation Database and autosomal dominant according to PMID: 37892203 -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenome-Nilou LabSep 05, 2021- -
Hearing impairment Pathogenic:1
Likely pathogenic, flagged submissionclinical testingDepartment of Otolaryngology – Head & Neck Surgery, Cochlear Implant CenterApr 12, 2021PS1_Strong, PM2_Moderate, PM5_Moderate, PP3_Supporting -
not specified Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingWomen's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorpDec 24, 2021Variant summary: GJB2 c.487A>G (p.Met163Val) results in a conservative amino acid change located in the extracellular 2 domain (Tang_2006) of the encoded protein sequence. Three of five in-silico tools predict a damaging effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00014 in 251140 control chromosomes, predominantly at a frequency of 0.00075 within the South Asian subpopulation in the gnomAD database. The observed variant frequency within South Asian control individuals in the gnomAD database is approximately 2.2 fold of the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in GJB2 causing Non-Syndromic Hearing Loss phenotype (0.00034), strongly suggesting that the variant is a benign polymorphism found primarily in populations of South Asian origin. c.487A>G has been reported in the literature as a VUS with a non-informative genotype (i.e., second allele not specified or heterozygous) for a recessive mode of inheritance among individuals with various forms of moderate non sensorineural hearing loss undergoing genetic evaluation in small and large sized gene panels for hearing loss (example, Marlin_2001, Janecke_2002, Bayazit_2003, Tang_2006, Hamid_2009, Padma_2009, Bonyadi_2009, Yilmaz_2010, Al-Qahtani_2010, Mahdieh_2011, Falah_2012, Leone_2017, Buonfiglio_2020, Xie_2021). At-least one individual with moderate hearing loss reported a homozygous genotype although no family history, co-segregation/co-occurrence was specified (Amorini_2015). One family where the variant was transmitted from a father with late onset hearing impairment to two affected siblings with early onset hearing loss reported a possible instance of autosomal dominant transmission with anticipation (Falah_2012). Another report speculates a role in digenic inheritance with synergistic heterozygosity for this variant and variants in the TMPRSS3 gene (Leone_2017). However, a firm conclusion regarding these atypical modes of inheritance remain speculative. These data indicate that the variant may be associated with disease. At least two publications report experimental evidence evaluating an impact on protein function (example, Bruzzone_2003, Press_2017). The most pronounced variant effect results in a complete inability to form homotypic channels since the level of junctional conductance measured never exceeded background values (Bruzzone_2003) and impaired gap junction function (Press_2017). Seven clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 with a predominant consensus as VUS (n=6) (likely pathogenic, n=1). Some submitters cite overlapping evidence utilized in the context of this evaluation and the prevailing interpretation even in most recent publications remains as VUS (example, Buonfiglio_2020). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as uncertain significance. -
Nonsyndromic genetic hearing loss Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingINGEBI, INGEBI / CONICETAug 31, 2020Based on ACMG/AMP guidelines and Hearing Loss Expert Panel specific criteria: the filtering allele frequency of c.487A>G, p.Met163Val variant in GJB2 gene is 0,05% (23/30604 South Asian alleles with 95%CI) from Genome Aggregation Database (http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org; calculated by using inverse allele frequency at https://www.cardiodb.org/allelefrequencyapp/) which meets the criteria to apply to PM2_Supporting rule. Computational evidence predicted a pathogenic effect of the mutation to the protein (REVELscore: 0.869) applying to PP3 criteria. The p.Met163Val change has been identified only in heterozygous state in several patients (PMID: 11493200, 14643477, 15964725, 12189487, 12872268). Besides, in two familial cases this variant segregate in two affected individuals and their affected fathers (PMID:22208444). So, this evidence is not enough to be counted. On the other hand, p.Met163Val change was identified in homozygous state in a control subject meeting BS2 rule (PMID: 20086291). Functional studies demonstrated a highly reduction of dye transfer of p.Met163Val mutant in HeLa cells (PMID:28428247). Besides, it was shown that this mutant was unable to form functional gap junction channels in Xenopus Laevis oocytes (PMID:12505163). Hence, PS3_Moderate criteria was applied. In summary, the clinical significance of this variant is currently uncertain (PM2_Supporting, PP3, PS3_Moderate, BS2). -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Uncertain
0.36
BayesDel_addAF
Pathogenic
0.17
D
BayesDel_noAF
Pathogenic
0.38
CADD
Uncertain
24
DANN
Uncertain
0.99
DEOGEN2
Uncertain
0.70
D;D;D
Eigen
Uncertain
0.50
Eigen_PC
Uncertain
0.57
FATHMM_MKL
Pathogenic
0.97
D
LIST_S2
Uncertain
0.89
.;.;D
M_CAP
Uncertain
0.14
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.22
T;T;T
MetaSVM
Uncertain
0.76
D
MutationAssessor
Benign
1.2
L;L;L
MutationTaster
Benign
1.0
A;A
PrimateAI
Uncertain
0.55
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-2.2
N;N;.
REVEL
Pathogenic
0.87
Sift
Benign
0.23
T;T;.
Sift4G
Benign
0.17
T;T;.
Polyphen
0.91
P;P;P
Vest4
0.93
MVP
0.90
MPC
0.082
ClinPred
0.22
T
GERP RS
5.5
Varity_R
0.67
gMVP
0.89

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs80338949; hg19: chr13-20763234; API