rs80356839

Positions:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -17 ACMG points: 0P and 17B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS2

The ENST00000357654.9(BRCA1):c.75C>T(p.Pro25=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000596 in 1,610,856 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 3 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★★). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. P25P) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.000039 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.000062 ( 3 hom. )

Consequence

BRCA1
ENST00000357654.9 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Likely benign reviewed by expert panel B:20

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.455

Variant links:

Genes affected

BRCA1 (HGNC:1100): (BRCA1 DNA repair associated) This gene encodes a 190 kD nuclear phosphoprotein that plays a role in maintaining genomic stability, and it also acts as a tumor suppressor. The BRCA1 gene contains 22 exons spanning about 110 kb of DNA. The encoded protein combines with other tumor suppressors, DNA damage sensors, and signal transducers to form a large multi-subunit protein complex known as the BRCA1-associated genome surveillance complex (BASC). This gene product associates with RNA polymerase II, and through the C-terminal domain, also interacts with histone deacetylase complexes. This protein thus plays a role in transcription, DNA repair of double-stranded breaks, and recombination. Mutations in this gene are responsible for approximately 40% of inherited breast cancers and more than 80% of inherited breast and ovarian cancers. Alternative splicing plays a role in modulating the subcellular localization and physiological function of this gene. Many alternatively spliced transcript variants, some of which are disease-associated mutations, have been described for this gene, but the full-length natures of only some of these variants has been described. A related pseudogene, which is also located on chromosome 17, has been identified. [provided by RefSeq, May 2020]

BRCA1 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -17 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.57).

BP6

Variant 17-43124022-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr17-43124022-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 55691.Status of the report is reviewed_by_expert_panel, 3 stars. Variant chr17-43124022-G-A is described in Lovd as [Benign]. Variant chr17-43124022-G-A is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.455 with no splicing effect.

BS2

High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 3 AD,AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	MANE	Protein	UniProt
BRCA1	NM_007294.4 linkuse as main transcript	c.75C>T	p.Pro25=	synonymous_variant	2/23	ENST00000357654.9	NP_009225.1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
BRCA1	ENST00000357654.9 linkuse as main transcript	c.75C>T	p.Pro25=	synonymous_variant	2/23	1	NM_007294.4	ENSP00000350283	P4	P38398-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.0000394

AC:

AN:

152148

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.000131

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.000385

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.00

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.000955

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.0000239

AC:

AN:

251038

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.00000737

AC XY:

AN XY:

135668

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.000326

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.0000617

AC:

AN:

1458708

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000386

AC XY:

AN XY:

725934

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.000504

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.00000180

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.00113

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.0000394

AC:

AN:

152148

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000269

AC XY:

AN XY:

74326

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.000131

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.000385

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.000955

Alfa

AF:

0.000174

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.0000756

Asia WGS

AF:

0.00664

AC:

AN:

3478

ClinVar

Significance: Likely benign

Submissions summary: Benign:20

Revision: reviewed by expert panel

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified

Benign:5

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital	Aug 15, 2023	- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Cancer Genetics and Genomics Laboratory, British Columbia Cancer Agency	Apr 18, 2017	- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Department of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, Queen's University	Apr 20, 2017	- -
Benign, no assertion criteria provided	research	King Laboratory, University of Washington	Sep 01, 2019	- -
Benign, no assertion criteria provided	clinical testing	Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht	-	- -

not provided

Benign:4

Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided	clinical testing	Clinical Genetics Laboratory, Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute	-	- -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided	clinical testing	Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC)	-	- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories	May 24, 2017	- -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided	clinical testing	Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center	-	- -

Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 1

Benign:3

Likely benign, reviewed by expert panel	curation	Evidence-based Network for the Interpretation of Germline Mutant Alleles (ENIGMA)	Jun 29, 2017	Synonymous substitution variant, with low bioinformatic likelihood to result in a splicing aberration (Splicing prior probability 0.02; http://priors.hci.utah.edu/PRIORS/). -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	KCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control Center	Jul 07, 2023	- -
Benign, no assertion criteria provided	clinical testing	Breast Cancer Information Core (BIC) (BRCA1)	Jul 19, 2006	- -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome

Benign:3

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	curation	Sema4, Sema4	Feb 03, 2021	- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Ambry Genetics	Aug 04, 2014	This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health	Apr 13, 2015	- -

Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome

Benign:2

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp	Feb 01, 2024	- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Institute for Biomarker Research, Medical Diagnostic Laboratories, L.L.C.	Oct 17, 2023	- -

Breast and/or ovarian cancer

Benign:1

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario

Jun 14, 2021

- -

Malignant tumor of breast

Benign:1

Benign, no assertion criteria provided

clinical testing

Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System

The BRCA1 p.Pro25Pro variant was identified in the literature (Bowles_2014_Myriad Publ, Ozcelik H_2012_22874498). However, no proband information was available. The variant was identified in dbSNP (ID: rs80356839) â€šÃ„ÃºWith Likely benign alleleâ€šÃ„Ã¹, Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC) database (released Oct 20th, 2014) in 4 of 120942 chromosomes (frequency: 3.31e-05) from a population of East Asian (4 of 8640 chromosomes) The variant was not found in African, Latino, South Asian, European (Finnish), European (Non-Finnish) and other individuals. The variant was also identified in the ClinVar database (classified as a Benign by BIC and Gene DX and as Likely Benign by Invitae), GeneInsight through the Canadian Open Genetics Repository (http://opengenetics.ca/) (2X, classified as â€šÃ„ÃºIARC1 and IARC2â€šÃ„Ã¹ by 2 clinical laboratories), the BIC database (1X with unknown clinical importance).The variant was also previously identified by our laboratory 6X.The Pro25Pro variant is not expected to have clinical significance because it does not result in a change of amino acid and is not located in a known consensus splice site. In addition, in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer, HumanSpliceFinder) do not predict a difference in splicing. Additionally, at the ACMG Meeting in March 2014, ( Bowles_2014_Myriad Publ) Myriad announced that â€šÃ„ÃºBRCA1 c.75C>T (p.Pro25Pro) has been previously observed in a patient with decreased mRNA transcript levels and was postulated to be pathogenic. However, in Myriadâ€šÃ„Ã´s patient population, this variant co-occurs in trans with known deleterious BRCA1 mutations in five patients and has been found in the homozygous state in 14 patients, strongly indicating a benign classification. History weighting analysis confirms the benign nature of this variant.â€šÃ„Ã¹ In summary, based on the above information, this variant meets our laboratory's criteria to be classified as benign. -

Familial cancer of breast

Benign:1

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Baylor Genetics

Feb 23, 2017

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.57

CADD

Benign

8.4

DANN

Benign

0.82

RBP_binding_hub_radar

0.0

RBP_regulation_power_radar

1.7

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over